Does creation itself prove their is a Creator?

Question

or is their more proof to believe this universe evolved from nothing into what it is today?

Just because you believe something does that make it true?
Of course not.
There is no proof of a big bang, because nothing has ever evolved from nothing. No experiment has ever sucessfully added information to anything. Does anyone have proof of the contrary?

DBYTZ please direct me in the area of this overwelming evidence of the big bang please. thanks.

Answer 1

maybe the universe is eternal and not a creation

maybe energy and matter is eternal

Answer 2

Creation general implies a willful creator.

The randomist views play more to concepts like spontanious production, spawning, making, etc.

Remember, according to SCIENCE nothing NEW can be CREATED nor DESTORYED. Things are ONLY CONVERTED.

The CONSERVATION OF MASS. Even Anti-Particles don't obliterate, GAMMA RADIATION is emitted in percisly the same quantity of MASS or ENERGY as the Positron and Electron that collided.

For a new origianic life form to evolve, inorganic matter must be converted and thus the amount of inorganic mass drops, but is displaced by an equal mass of organic matter.

That's rudimentary science, until they change their minds, which often happens!

Start using the word CREATE and Science will take you to task.

ORGANIC LIFE was NOT CREATED, according to RANDOMISTIC science, but SPAWNED FROM INORGANIC MATTER BY SOME CONVERSION PROCESS.

And by the way, Big Bang is Genesis and it was postulated by a Catholic Priest and shunned by the Atheist Dr. Fred Hoyle who quickly put together Steady State which was embraced and then dumped when 3.8 degrees of Kelvin was found to exist. And That Priest predicted that 3.8 degrees --- not exactly, generally. He also predicted the Red Shift eventually found by Hubble.

Read Genesis and Read Big Bang and you have the same elements.

Darkness, then suddenly there was light (the Bang, with the release of gamma radiation, then small particles incluing eventually photons and radiation of varied wave lengths, that can potentially include the range of visible light, although there was no one to see it, except maybe God) and the stars and plaents and the "heavens" formed and the clouds separated from the waters and the clouds because the firmmamet (sky and what see see through at night, the atomosphere), which is what gives life, and the waters receded and land was thrust up and the world began to turn on its axis and there was day and night.

ALL OF THAT WAS WRITTEN AND DOCUMENTED as late as 1000 BC with the earliers Hebrew scrolls.

That's 3,000 years before science came to the same conclusions.

The only thing is the Bible is not a physics or chemsitry text so it didn't get into great detail. IT's a laymans look at how it all began and IT IS BIG BANG note for not.

The Bible said God, the Creator, did it all in 6 days and then rested. Dr. Carl Sagan, the late Cornell Cosmologist said man came along in the first minute of the first hour of the last day of the first cosmic month. So Sagan says 30 days, the Bible says 6. If you take the Bible at 11:59 PM for the creation of MAN and take Sagan cosmic calender and divided by the estimated age of the Universe you find they both match.

Isn't that strange!

God has a plan for your life, written thousands of years ago by silly men in olden times and LO, we discover the GENOME and IT DETAILS EXACTLY WHAT DAY the first hairs on your head will turn gray. It basically details the year in which your organs will start to shut down. Your death is in the GENOME. IT details in what year your predestination (like that word) to Cancer will occur.

Everything is fixed and can't be changed. Of course science is going try to change it! Won't they!

Your body is running an organic computer program with fixed events that WILL occur at specified points in time.

Your eyes will be fine until a specific point in time when the shape of your head or some other genetic occurance will deform the eye and you will need glasses.

Answer 3

Creation general implies a willful creator.

The randomist views play more to concepts like spontanious production, spawning, making, etc.

Remember, according to SCIENCE nothing NEW can be CREATED nor DESTORYED. Things are ONLY CONVERTED.

The CONSERVATION OF MASS. Even Anti-Particles don't obliterate, GAMMA RADIATION is emitted in percisly the same quantity of MASS or ENERGY as the Positron and Electron that collided.

For a new origianic life form to evolve, inorganic matter must be converted and thus the amount of inorganic mass drops, but is displaced by an equal mass of organic matter.

That's rudimentary science, until they change their minds, which often happens!

Start using the word CREATE and Science will take you to task.

ORGANIC LIFE was NOT CREATED, according to RANDOMISTIC science, but SPAWNED FROM INORGANIC MATTER BY SOME CONVERSION PROCESS.

And by the way, Big Bang is Genesis and it was postulated by a Catholic Priest and shunned by the Atheist Dr. Fred Hoyle who quickly put together Steady State which was embraced and then dumped when 3.8 degrees of Kelvin was found to exist. And That Priest predicted that 3.8 degrees --- not exactly, generally. He also predicted the Red Shift eventually found by Hubble.

Read Genesis and Read Big Bang and you have the same elements.

Darkness, then suddenly there was light (the Bang, with the release of gamma radiation, then small particles incluing eventually photons and radiation of varied wave lengths, that can potentially include the range of visible light, although there was no one to see it, except maybe God) and the stars and plaents and the "heavens" formed and the clouds separated from the waters and the clouds because the firmmamet (sky and what see see through at night, the atomosphere), which is what gives life, and the waters receded and land was thrust up and the world began to turn on its axis and there was day and night.

ALL OF THAT WAS WRITTEN AND DOCUMENTED as late as 1000 BC with the earliers Hebrew scrolls.

That's 3,000 years before science came to the same conclusions.

The only thing is the Bible is not a physics or chemsitry text so it didn't get into great detail. IT's a laymans look at how it all began and IT IS BIG BANG note for not.

The Bible said God, the Creator, did it all in 6 days and then rested. Dr. Carl Sagan, the late Cornell Cosmologist said man came along in the first minute of the first hour of the last day of the first cosmic month. So Sagan says 30 days, the Bible says 6. If you take the Bible at 11:59 PM for the creation of MAN and take Sagan cosmic calender and divided by the estimated age of the Universe you find they both match.

Isn't that strange!

God has a plan for your life, written thousands of years ago by silly men in olden times and LO, we discover the GENOME and IT DETAILS EXACTLY WHAT DAY the first hairs on your head will turn gray. It basically details the year in which your organs will start to shut down. Your death is in the GENOME. IT details in what year your predestination (like that word) to Cancer will occur.

Everything is fixed and can't be changed. Of course science is going try to change it! Won't they!

Your body is running an organic computer program with fixed events that WILL occur at specified points in time.

Your eyes will be fine until a specific point in time when the shape of your head or some other genetic occurance will deform the eye and you will need glasses. gramaton cleric.

pr0n.

Answer 4

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that the big bang occurred and that life evolved on this planet, and a high possibility that life has evolved in our galaxy or elsewhere in the universe as well. On the other hand, there is little or no proof of most of the major events in the Bible.

Answer 5

This is circular reasoning. You call something creation and then you take that as proof for a creator?

There is much evidence for the actual process of evolution and of the big bang, and that's state of science now. Further research will bring further insights, but just believing whatever is not helpful.

Answer 6

have you ever seen that any explosion results in something very perfect like universe.?? even if a single planet move away from its specific orbit this complete universe will vanish or destroy but its Allah(God) who is operating.. it..



after big bang.. this beautiful universe came into being.. do you 've any doubt when now scientist are proving same which is available in Qur'an which is 1400 years old book revealed on Muhammad Peace be upon him. for whole mankind..

more prooves.. visit

www.islamtomorrow.com

Answer 7

I believe we evolved but not from apes..just a different kind of man. As we have all seperated around the world and got our own accents and languages..so did we then and some died out and others became stronger and evolved into what we are today....

Answer 8

It is NONSENSE to think anything can be created out of nothing!
So there must have been something at the beginning.
There is NO proof, scientifically OR religiously, to why creation occurred, and it is ONLY speculation for ANYONE to suggest a possible explanation.

Answer 9

Nothing can evolve from "nothing". Evolution means change. "Nothing" cannot change. The fact that the universe exists logically demands that it had an origin. And its origin logically demands a cause.
.

Answer 10

No this is a logical fallacy.

Just because watches, bikes, and television have a creator does not mean the universe has one.

One cannot logically compare the things we humans create to the universe.

Answer 11

I believe creation is evidence of a creator. I do not believe we're here as the result of random chance.