That would cut down on quite a bit of nonsense.
2007-03-09 01:57:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Adults should keep in mind that there are children on the section and watch the content of their questions. Points are a game, if you want an answer about a subject that isn't appropriate for a G rated audience ask an individual that is of age off channel...Jim
2007-03-09 10:17:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I think, as in most things, that they should know both sides of the argument to make a decision for themselves. If they are only told one side of the argument, then they are not getting the full picture. Let them come.
2007-03-09 10:04:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, I'm also opposed to seeing children exposed to non-Christian things and Atheist propaganda and learning about books from people like Dawkins. Ignornace is bliss!
2007-03-09 10:12:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How could you possibly regulate this?
I think we just need to remember to be responsible in what we're putting out there in case children are on here with us.
2007-03-09 10:09:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. It is the responsibility of the parents to determine if their children should be here, NOT anyone esle.
2007-03-10 03:15:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by gotherunereadings 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. I'd hate to see a kid exposed to all this religion.
2007-03-09 09:55:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
there are a few other groups that I wouldn't mind excluding as well.
2007-03-09 09:57:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm opposed to letting children see all this god propaganda.
2007-03-09 09:58:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋