English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

That would cut down on quite a bit of nonsense.

2007-03-09 01:57:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Adults should keep in mind that there are children on the section and watch the content of their questions. Points are a game, if you want an answer about a subject that isn't appropriate for a G rated audience ask an individual that is of age off channel...Jim

2007-03-09 10:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, I think, as in most things, that they should know both sides of the argument to make a decision for themselves. If they are only told one side of the argument, then they are not getting the full picture. Let them come.

2007-03-09 10:04:29 · answer #3 · answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7 · 0 0

I agree, I'm also opposed to seeing children exposed to non-Christian things and Atheist propaganda and learning about books from people like Dawkins. Ignornace is bliss!

2007-03-09 10:12:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How could you possibly regulate this?

I think we just need to remember to be responsible in what we're putting out there in case children are on here with us.

2007-03-09 10:09:45 · answer #5 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 1 0

Absolutely not. It is the responsibility of the parents to determine if their children should be here, NOT anyone esle.

2007-03-10 03:15:56 · answer #6 · answered by gotherunereadings 3 · 0 0

Yes. I'd hate to see a kid exposed to all this religion.

2007-03-09 09:55:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

there are a few other groups that I wouldn't mind excluding as well.

2007-03-09 09:57:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'm opposed to letting children see all this god propaganda.

2007-03-09 09:58:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers