I am starting college in September to become a nurse and I have herpes.
I think it is that you can not become a doctor or nurse if you have a deadly STD but something like Herpes is okay.
2007-03-04 11:06:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Diamonds_Glow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we'd be out a lot of doctors and nurses if this were true.
While most schools and places you would work DO require a 'physical' before hiring this is to make sure you are physically capable of doing your job, and also to make sure you have the proper immunities to all the nasties out there because you are potentially exposed to a lot of things. If you don't have shot records (us older folks actually had measles, mumps, things that now-a-days you can get shots for!) they do titres, they make sure you are at least offered immunizations for hepatitis and so on.
Now surprisingly the hospital I just started working for has a policy against working while having an active cold sore because we touch our faces all the time without realizing it, but this is the first place I've ever worked with a policy like that. Transmission would be extremely unlikely!
We generally don't have sex with our patients. They are safe, at least from us.
2007-03-04 14:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by laurie888 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, what does an STD do with being a good Doctor or Nurse? I don't understand. I am an RN and I have friends that are Doctors and none of us have ever been asked if we had STD's or AIDS. And they do not test you for them when you apply for a job!! I don't know why anyone would care what disease you had, I mean unless your screwing your Dr. or nurse who really cares?
2007-03-04 11:10:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is not true, at least not in the USA. Some states may limit patient contact if a provider has HIV, but I've never heard of it happening. I've never heard of it even coming up in an employment interview. I know nurses with STD's... probably know some docs too, but just don't know it...
Ed, RN
2007-03-04 11:27:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by RNcalledEd 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a nurse/physician assistant I can tell you that it is not true....nobody would know this. But I do believe that most college admission physical exams (for medical or nursing school or other healthcare professions)still do blood tests for syphilis (an RPR or STS). I do a number of these exams and I have never had one come back positive so I don't know what they do about it.
2007-03-04 11:44:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by tlbrown42000 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
not true at all. I work in healthcare (radiation therapy) to get a job in the medical field you do not need to have a medical exam-you will need to have a general physical in order to get into school though, but they don't test for STD's. just make sure you are generally healthy and that you are able to do the lifting, bending etc that is involved in the job.
there is something called "universal precautions" that are a set of guidelines to protect healthcare workers and patients from transmitting diseases-ie. wearing gloves or masks, safe handlling of needles, syringes etc.
2007-03-04 11:13:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by jennifer p 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some factors in touch here. of course, the 1st is non secular; some religions require it and, in simple terms like another thought, this could't be fought with reason. Secondly is aesthetic value, because of fact confident, some women persons refuse to sleep with uncircumcised adult adult males because of fact they discover it gross or unhygienic. The wellness danger is minimum to nil IF uncircumcised adult adult males sparkling the foreskin precise, yet regrettably some are too lazy and/or ignorant to take action, quite whilst they're youthful (below mid-1920s). it is likewise a cultural style, it extremely is complicated to regulate no rely the custom. initially mom and dad did it to very youthful babies because of fact they believed they does not sense it as lots (much less gentle in that section as an infant) and does not undergo in suggestions it. it somewhat is not completely the case now (developmental psychologists have hypothesized that it ought to reason deeper psychological trauma each and every so often, besides the undeniable fact that it somewhat is a tentative hypothesis on its way out). and specific, the newborn won't be attentive to what the hell to think of till they're lots older, so won't be attentive to what they think of till they're too embarrassed to hold it up. there have been many, many thoughts of adult adult males attempting to do away with their own foreskins and injuring themselves, in simple terms because of fact they have been ashamed of the flaws. confident, this is stupid, besides the undeniable fact that it happens; according to danger we could desire to continuously not look to alter the circumcision style till our society can cope with the ramifications.
2016-10-17 06:52:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt that's true... how would the medical school know that they've had an STD? It's not like they can go and find the medical records or search it.
2007-03-04 11:06:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not true as one in four people or more has an STD. We would be in big trouble!
2007-03-04 11:05:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by steffy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don´t know how does it works in canada but in the countries that i´ve been working (7) that is not the case
2007-03-04 11:06:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋