why do some people still have bangs?
why do guns go bang?
why do gangs bang?
what about "Walk Like an Egyptian" by The BANGles?
Ha! So much for your "theory"
2007-02-24 23:49:53 · 12 answers · asked by hot carl sagan: ninja for hire 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Wayne T:
Are you retarded or something? Seriously, don't answer one of my questions ever again
2007-02-25 00:00:40 · update #1
Or like the time I banged your sister's hot friend?
2007-02-24 23:57:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
nicely, the oldest globular clusters, which have the oldest stars conventional, are round 11 billion years or extra in age. If the universe became 9 billion years previous, then those stars will be older than the universe, and that would not make experience. The inverse of the speed of boost grant you with an estimate of the era of time because the universe began. this grants a kind round 14 billion years in the past. This assumes notwithstanding that the universe has been increasing on an similar fee. by reading the most distant galaxies and proper determining their distance we may be able to make sure how the upward push of the universe has replaced. in modern-day years we've discovered that the universe is completely accelerating. If the universe were increasing at a consistent fee, then it will be 14 billion years previous. If it really is been accelerating then it must be youthful. From those 2 arguments we see that the universe is larger than 11 billion years yet below 14. extra precise calculations appropriate to the composition of the universe show an age of 13.7 billion years.
2016-12-04 22:20:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All the bangs you talk about are "little bangs".
Now, the Big Bang was really, really something else: grander, full colour, Dolby surround stereo!
In *your* theater starting from wednesday 14 billion years ago.
2007-02-25 23:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by cordefr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God Spoke, and Bang it Happened.
I myself find it interesting that most persons feel that they must believe in science, or God.
whom knows possibly God and science function in a symbiotic relationship and it is entirely possible to believe in both.
2007-02-24 23:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by Thoughtfull 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL u r retarded :+)
i think god created the big bang.
2007-02-24 23:56:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I just have one the to say (sing) to you sir!
"She bangs She bangs"
Yeah does that ring a bell...
What about this....
"Get it on...BANG a Gong...Get it on"
Thats t rex baby!!!
2007-02-24 23:53:54 · answer #6 · answered by Scott L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yup, you've finally disproved decades of scientific inquiry with your insightful reasoning.
2007-02-24 23:54:24 · answer #7 · answered by Holly R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you trying to make a point here?
2007-02-24 23:55:08 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lack of intelligence hinders research
2007-02-24 23:53:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What ever religion you belong to, you do it NO service. belief will never replace facts!
2007-02-25 00:01:36 · answer #10 · answered by raymondo C 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋