Evolutionist: What evidence can you provide that all your evidence is worthy of consideration?

Answer 1

considering that there are thousands of scientists who all agree on the same thing, coming to the same conclusions independently and haveing that evidence corroberated througout the academies of science?

geee i dont know

damn i love sarcasm!

Answer 2

All evidence is always worthy of consideration. That's what makes it evidence. Some evidence agrees with a hypothesis, some disagrees. As scientists try to explore a hypothesis, they eliminate "evidence" that is not real or is actually just a coincidence (this is why scientist have control groups and control the variables in an experiment) and eventually get either proof or disproof of the hypothesis. It this point, all the evidence proves that evolution is occuring, has ocurred and will occur. That's how we know.

Answer 3

Holy loaded question Batman!

you ask what evidence can I provide that my evidence is worthy of your consideration. Do you realize how absurd this sounds? Once I give you evidence that it is worthy of consideration, are you just going to ask me what makes my evidence for my evidence for my evidence being worthy of consideration ad infinitum?

Honestly, what do you even mean? All evidence is worthy of consideration, even evidence in favor of religious beliefs. In that case, however, it simply is not sufficient to back up the claims that are being made. Evolution, on the other hand, has vast amounts of data and supporting evidence, all of which is "worthy" of consideration.

You are asking the wrong question here. Any "evidence" not worthy of consideration isn't evidence, its bias or spin.

Answer 4

I would say that that's fairly impossible to answer, because at any moment new evolutionary evidence could filter into existence. You would need to bring every evolutionary scientist in the world to the table and have them discuss their findings. This is inconceivable not to mention it would drastically cut into their research.

I know it's hard figuring out where life came from. But I have two things to offer to you. First, nothing can come from nothing, so there's a pretty good chance we're not gonna wind up as nothings. And second, you're a human being first, a thinker second. Even when your mind stops it's chattering, your heart still knows to keep on beating.

Answer 5

All evidence is worthy of consideration, whether faith or fact based. Only a fool would dismiss something as not worth considering simply because of disbelief in the issue.

Answer 6

Here are a couple of books you might want to look at:

"A Short History of Almost Everything" by Bill Bryson and "The Map That Changed The World," by Simon Winchester.

I suspect you won't read them, but that's where you can find evidence of the evidence you seek.

Answer 7

Your ignorance is evidence that you have never read a book in your life, but that's the price to be paid for dropping out in third grade. If you had attended even a high school science class, the facts and reality would be self-evident.


.

Answer 8

Here is my list. There is more, I just tried to stick with the easy to understand ones.

* Fossils - the order can be determined by stratification alone (no radiological dating) it is unarguable and life started simple and got more complex. Here is a simple chart to show what I mean: http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/fossils/success...
* Anatomical similarities between species.
* Chemical similarities between species.
* Mitochondrial DNA regressive studies. - This comes only from your mother and the only changes to it are through mutations. These mutations occur at a known rate, and converge world wide 150,000 years ago give or take. If Eve (6000 years ago) was the only female, it would be almost identical world wide. It is not. The flood gives a second bottleneck that matches the facts even less well.
* Geographic distribution of related species. Meaning related species are usually near each other.
* Wisdom Teeth - there isn't room on your jaw for them anymore.
* Your little toe - totally useless. Nice intelligent design here.
* Your appendix - totally useless now but it does digest cellulose in other species.
* Your inner eyelids - They don't even work now, but they do for lots of other animals like house cats. Bet you didn't even know you had 'em.
* Vestigial DNA - meaning chromosomes that we have but don't use, but that are used in other species. We have several that other primates use but are totally useless to us.
* The fact that we share so much DNA among species
* There are no wild cows. They evolved through artificial selection and are totally man made.
* Different breeds of dogs, cats, livestock.
* Viruses and bacteria evolve quickly and you can actually see it. This is why you need a new flu shot every year.
* Your tail bone. It is even not that uncommon to be born with a tail.
* Goosebumps - this would be useful if we had fur because it fluffs it and makes more insulation. For us it is worthless.
* The hair standing up on your neck when you are frightened. Animals use this to make themselves look bigger. Doesn't work when you walk upright and don't have fur.
* The fact that humans have gotten measurably and heritability taller since the 1600s
* The fact that humans jaw have gotten measurably and heritability smaller since the 1600s
* The fact that humans little toes have gotten measurably and heritability smaller since the 1600s
* Human lower back problems. Your back is intelligently designed to have support from your shoulders.
* Transitional fossils - here are several lists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_tra...

Answer 9

Fossil records, which are much more than a single chapter in a single book that has only the faith of a minority of humans on this planet Earth to buttress its reliability.

BTW, be more careful of how you word questions. Stating others must provide evidence "of your evidence" admits that we have evidence and implies you do not.

Answer 10

"considering that there are thousands of scientists who all agree on the same thing, coming to the same conclusions independently and haveing that evidence corroberated througout the academies of science?"

I would like to see these thousands of scientists create a human from two substances. 1)Dirt 2) Water

This is a simple ingredient of humans. Now, GOD created us from this, and the only thing "Science" can come up with so far, is a CLONED SHEEP. Hmmmmm go figure.
God:1
Science:0

Answer 11

Like Jerome mentioned, you're extra acceptable off basically searching for information on the subject count in google. Take the physique of recommendations that if it incredibly is hard to appreciate, save attempting. just about each and every little thing in technology makes finished experience (just about...) and is fully logical. do no longer difficulty attempting to appreciate many of the extra loopy issues that happen on the quantum scale in spite of the undeniable fact that. That **** is easy weird and wonderful.