Have you seen the Congressional bill introduced by McCarthy in New York(D)?

Question

Carolyn McCarthy, NY(D) just introduced a bill to Congress that would ban thousands more firearms than the Clinton gun ban was ever to effect. Any and all semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

Answer 1

Bound's hubby here:

The Democrats in today's Congress are the closest you'll ever see to Socialists. Keep in mind, most politicians are lawyers whose legal expertise has come from defending criminals not the law abiding citizens. Democrats tend to represent minorities and the lower income spectrum who would most often be family of those that they represented in court. The Democrats tend to represent the interest of their client base. I defy you to find a single piece of legislation the Democrats introduce and support that protects the interests of the working class or the upper class.

The bleeding hearts of the Democrats will launch this country into either a social class or economic civil war that will launch the government as the lower classes against the gun owning segments of American society. The government has done little to stabilize the economy, no matter what they say. Too many Americans are either unemployed or under employed. The question to be asked... why is Venezuela more economically stable than the U.S where gas has just risen $0.12 a gallon and in the U.S. the price of gas is resuming it's climb toward $3 a gallon. The economic policies of the Democrats are designed to break the American public and their gun control laws are aimed at disarming the American public that would resist the switch to Socialism.

Thanks for the soap box!

Good luck.

Answer 2

When will the Libs realize that guns are not the problem. New York, New Jersey, California, Chicago and Washington DC all have the highest restrictive gun laws in the nation, yet have the highest murder rates as well. That should pretty much dispel the myth of how successful Gun Control is.

Banning Semi-autos would be a disaster. If a criminal has a semi-auto or even full-auto weapon and you have a bolt-action rifle, things may not turn out well for you.

Answer 3

Yes, I did.

She's doing it under the disguise of "assault rifle ban" and "police protection".. The only true assault rifles require a BATF stamp. Semi-autos are NOT assault rifles no matter what.

Funny, I know several POLICE OFFICERS who OPPOSE this ATTACK and INFRINGMENT on the 2nd Amendment.

Democraps are gun-grabbing morons, who would rather let illegals flood our country and let judges allow sex offenders and murderers walk our streets. But as long as those "evil guns" aren't in the hands of law-abiding citizens, we'll all be safe. BS, BS, and more BS. Prosecute criminals, stop the illegal gun trade, and LEAVE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS ALONE!

The Dems are pro-choice except when it comes to the Second Amendment. Will they ever get an effing clue..

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!!!!!

STOP INFRINGING IT YOU MORONS!!! You took an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution, NOT infringe our rights! The Second Amendment is about ALL GUNS! NOT HUNTING! Firearm ownership!

Answer 4

Well, that's the typical government -impowering crap that I've come to expect from liberal closet-aristocrats.
They never vote to disarm criminals or the police,
(without armed criminals there's no need for armed cops)
They always want to diasarm the law-abiding citizen,
(The Minutemen of the American Revolution were armed, law-abiding citizens...)
Just like Hitler disarmed the Law abiding citizens of Germany,
...Right before he took total control of the government.
(and look how well THAT worked out for the world.)
(worked great for Hitler, )
(Not so great for The German people. Especially the Jews)
Little would-be Hitlers' always want more from the "commoners"
Far more than (armed) "commoners", would ever willingly surrender.
Therefore "Little Hitlers" first priority is always to disarm the commoners.
So they can exercize the TOTAL CONTROL they crave and drool over.
Absolute Power.
For the Absolutely Corrupt.

Answer 5

Yeah, we're all screwed. I own a so called "assault rifle" for legitimate sporting and self defensive purposes. Banning them only affects law abiding citizens, and will render them defenseless against criminals and the government. And thus turning otherwise law abiding citizens into criminals themselves.


Banning semi-automatic rifles and shotguns will not reduce violent crime. Criminals' awareness of heavily armed citizens will.

Answer 6

Yes and it sucks! It also has no sunset clause, which means it never goes away. Lets all hope it don't pass and write or Email your representatives and Senators and demand they vote against it. Screw that NY Ho! (and hillery, too!)
"Any "law" made which is contrary to the Constitution, is not a law at all."--Thomas Jefferson (I think he said that, but somebody important did say it.)

Answer 7

i have read the article. so much feel good is put into that crap. how can an so called assault rifle be any more deadly than my Winchester stealth cal 223. cartridge wise.
as one said, assault rifles require at govt tax. personally, i don't think it will go far. but look at Hillary, and Nancy. never thought that they would be where they are now.

Answer 8

doubtful itl get held up in court. i love the liberal feel good idea but the reality is the right to bear arms is constitutionally protected.

Answer 9

It is good to keep an eye on these politicians but she doesn't have the clout. (I HOPE!!!)

Answer 10

I told you so......that didn't take long did it.