English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We can't control the whole world,without a lot of help from others.

2007-02-24 14:12:29 · 18 answers · asked by Tired Old Man 7 in Politics & Government Military

Yes it is Iran i am talking about with other countries pulling troops out,when we want to send MORE does not make sence.america is being used!

2007-02-25 09:16:37 · update #1

18 answers

Mark my words...we will not now, nor ever, invade Iran. Its not feasible in the least. I know this is what you're talking about when you say "another country".

That being said, we have the most technologically advanced and powerful air force on the face of the planet, so while I believe we will never INVADE Iran, theres absolutely NO reason we can't bomb it back to the pre-stone age, and theres little, if anything, they can do about it.

Also, what do you mean by "a lot of help from others"?
I think you might be mixed up, and you're probably referring to France & England, considering it was the US that pulled their rear ends out of the fire twice, yet they repay us by stabbing us in the back.

Thanks guys!

2007-02-24 16:51:14 · answer #1 · answered by machine_head_327 3 · 0 1

I actually think its more of verbal threats to IRAN that are attempting to buy time for Presidents latest surge, that he and V.P. keep bantering about IRAN.

Think about it. Everyone including republicans know we are short staffed right now. An attakc on IRAN would be suicidal, and bush knows it.
But what if we talk a big game agianst IRAN, then maybe everyone will forget about why we're staying in IRAQ, and allow us to stick with our plan -- and allow another 80 troops per month die

SOmeone talked about a draft. Realistically, think of the outcome of what a draft woudl do. Civil unrest, and with our national guard unable to tend to all the riots that would break out in protect, I doubt Congres would allow it.

Jojo -- our greatest president was asassinated a long time ago.

2007-02-24 14:19:54 · answer #2 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 2 2

Kicking Iran's Shiite islamofascists out of Tehran will make the job easier in Iraq and Afghanistan because Iran is supplying our enemies in both of those countries. We should have bombed them already, like Clinton bombed Kosovo, using nothing but air power until they submit or are dead.

2007-02-24 14:47:18 · answer #3 · answered by jesuscuresislam 3 · 0 2

were not going to war with iran Bush isnt stuck in stupied he just has to deal with people talking trash about the us not having the power to handle a crisis and he just moved a few battle ships and air craft carriers around and everybody thinks were going to war iran isnt nothing but a trouble making child in need of a spanking and bush is ignoreing it the best he can

2007-02-24 15:26:17 · answer #4 · answered by dan m 6 · 0 2

oh they are going to get their assesss kick and i will explain why. they cant control iraq and that is 25 million.

iran on the other hand is 80 million 4 years ready and getting the help of russia and china. war with iran will boil over globally with other muslims targeting jewish and US sites.

good luck

http://360.yahoo.com/antiwar_girl

2007-02-24 14:17:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Don't blame me I voted for Kerry, George Bush is out of control and so is the real president Dead Eye Dick Cheney. In answer to your question the U.S. isn't going to handle fighting in another country. That is why we have Israel

2007-02-24 14:20:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

We do not need to fight another country. We need to be a sovereign nation again. We need to take care of our own people and work out solutions to problems that exist right here in the United States.

2007-02-24 14:16:54 · answer #7 · answered by super682003 4 · 3 2

The might of the US Military is so staggering its incomprehensible to an uniformed person, no we do not have the soldiers to occupy every nation on earth, that is why Bush allows the massive migration from the south to fill the ranks, we can however reduce any combination of enemies real military forces to smoldering junk with skeletons in days.

2007-02-24 14:28:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Does the words 'broken military' mean anything to anyone?

(Oh, wait...! We gotta PRETEND that we don't have an overstretched, undermanned, and ill-equipped force here...ya...that's it.)

2007-02-24 15:00:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Is your 'we' yet another stupid Iranian 'death to America' threat? Do you seriously intend to attack the USA?

2007-02-24 15:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers