English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Both sides there kill women and children.
It is not in our spirit.

2007-02-24 13:55:49 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

17 answers

NO
If you think the killing is going to stop after we leave I leave you with this to consider.
Iraqi civilians killed last year by ISLAMIC Terrorists 16,791

Iraqi civilians killed collaterally in incidents involving Americans
(and Islamic Terrorists) 225*

*Source: IraqBodyCount.net

So who is doing the majority of killing not us.

2007-02-24 14:00:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

he's no longer a bleeding coronary heart that needs to work out usa defeated. He sees that a loose and good Iraq is a key step in a greater good center East. He is familiar with that if we flow away, 1000's of hundreds will die and Iraq will advance to a greater danger. He is familiar with that we can not settle for defeat, tuck tail and run. He sees the shape and is familiar with that doing the acceptable suited element won't be the conventional element. no person needs to be domicile greater effective than troops, yet we choose a victory - we could desire to flow away Iraq in a state of secure practices - no longer chaos. If we pull out too quickly, real civil war will erupt and we'd likely be back there interior a year - to a greater deadly Iraq. we can not supply up Iraq to the insurgents. i assume its sparkling why some are squaddies and others are protesters - some basically have not got the tummy for sacrifice, some can not see previous the present - see what's greater valuable interior the long-term.

2016-10-01 22:38:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The American people voted for Bush after the Iraq war started, and we knew what we were voting for. Bush got more votes than any other Presidential candidate in history, so it is not honest to say the American people are not with Bush.
As for the killing of women and children, American soldiers do not deliberately target them and our enemy does. You are being dishonest when you suggest our soldiers target children.
Go read the koran and see the evil we are fighting.
Wake up and smell the jihad.

2007-02-24 15:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by jesuscuresislam 3 · 0 0

This latest garbage coming out of Iraq about the Shiite being angry with the US troops over the detention of some scum bags kid who was traveling from Iran to Iraq , crossing borders, but considered untouchable, because his old man is some kind of politician really sucks.

I think the shiite who are spouting off better get on their knees and beg forgiveness to the US commander for their scum sucking arrogance, or watch us pack our bags and leave these sorry pukes to resolve their own problems.

These arrogant nomads think they can criticize the American troops who are trying to help their sorry country get it's shiit together. Damn these shiite, these Iran lovin bastards who are probably our real enemy, why would we let them spew their crap at our troops over one worthless iraqi bastard?

It's time we got out of there once and for all. WE don't even know who the players are anymore. We don't know who are allies are and who the enemy is. Let the Jews deal with these devil worshiping scum suckers. They're smarter than we are, when it comes to dealing with these stupid camel drivers, so let them lead the charge. there's nothing we can do for these people.

This thing has become such a quagmire, we should let the Iraqi's just destroy themselves and we should concentrate on that little bastard in Iran.

2007-02-24 14:21:53 · answer #4 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0 0

Knowing Bush, that would be an impossibility. While admitting that it was his responsibilty for the past mistakes made in Iraq, he continues to insist on "staying the course" and "troop surge" (escalation). Later, he will admit responsibility to these mistakes again, then continue in making new mistakes. The American soldiers on the other hand, will continue to pay for these mistakes with their blood.

2007-02-24 23:22:16 · answer #5 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0 0

even when the women has explosive stuff under their coat and children with guns? Please classify who kill who? In war, everything is terrible; but we are proved that we try to avoid casualties to civilian as much as possible! Withdrawal and the corpses of those women and children are our family after some terrorist's attack!

2007-02-24 14:19:07 · answer #6 · answered by holyfire 4 · 0 0

How many innocent Iraqis are you willing to kill?

It is such a real shame how you are willing to condemn the Iraqi people to genocide just because there are a few terrorists trying to frighten the Iraqi people enough to accept them as dictators.

2007-02-24 14:07:57 · answer #7 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 4 0

It is not possible, in part because you don't speak for the American people, who, though sick of the war, don't favor an immediate pull-out. Nice try, though.

2007-02-24 15:08:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None, since the reason he went over there was highly questionable to begin with.

2007-02-24 23:48:01 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

Nice try, but isnt it exactly in the spirit of our government, whos supplied terroroist, turned their back on them leaving them to be slaughtered by the enemies we allied with them to fight, then flipped on them?

We armed IRAQ, we armed Al Queda, and no one can argue with me on that.

This from a former soldier, our dimplomatic leaders have brought this on their selves. Had we not flipped on IRAQ, they could have been useful, had we not turned our backs on Al queda, bin laden would probably still be an allie.

Everyone wants to fogret thepast, when it suits their arguement.
But we must remember the past so we dont do it again.

Presidents, stop making brittle alliances, otherwise it will come bite us on our behind later

KVERY -- acording to your arguement it wont stop if weleave -- so if we stay? you think our puny little force will be able to stop it?
Hasnt worked for the past 4 years.

I guessno one wants to hear the truth huh?

Thanks for proving my point voters. No one wants to remember the facts, the past that brought us to the now.

2007-02-24 14:01:41 · answer #10 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers