....Or is destroying the U.S. armed force`s moral just simply a byproduct of their thirst for complete political power ................ 'They won't be able to continue. They won't be able to do the deployment. They won't have the equipment, they don't have the training and they won't be able to do the work. There’s no question in my mind.”- John Murtha
2007-02-24 13:42:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes. In his draft dodger days Bill Clinton wrote,"I loathe the military" in a letter he wrote in one of his attempts to avoid joining John Kerry in Vietnam. These 4 words of Clinton's sum up the liberal attitude to the soldiers who keep us free.
Liberals live in a world of delusions where their freedoms are magically protected and they think they don't need a military to keep other countries from infringing on our American freedoms.
It's too bad we must protect the freedom of liberals in order to maintain our own freedom. If we could let them be subject to the tyranny our military protects them from for a while liberals would soon appreciayte and not hate our military like Clinton said he did in his draft dodger days.
2007-02-24 15:25:51 · answer #1 · answered by jesuscuresislam 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
u.s.'s combating adult men ought to stop combating and trespassing and assisting Bush wrangle oil. it really is like they could't locate some thing to do at residing house so that they pass 0.5 way international wide and %. on a susceptible united states of america to get loose oil, at tremendous cost to the taxpayers. each and anytime they wonder and awe yet another construction finished of human beings they sense reliable i wager. it really is not any ask your self the international hates individuals. pass residing house yankee, and stay residing house.
2016-12-04 22:00:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends what your definition of support is. Murtha should go back into the corps and then he would see how stupid he sounds.
2007-03-04 01:29:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Idiot.
Wouldn't the best thing for "america's fighting men" to be taken out of a situation where their lives are at risk?
What's bad for morale is to be forced into a situation (on fraudulent grounds) ill-equiped and ill-prepared to face the opposition. What could be more disheartening than having a boss who doesn't give a rats-azz about you?
2007-02-24 13:55:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I think you are badly mistaken. It is G W Bush, Chenney, et al, who continue to strike fear into the minds of the American people and terrorize them by incessant repetition of "the terrorists are out to get you" to justify their own personal agenda and to wage illegal wars against other nations. These cunning criminals will continue to parrot the same statements and pretexts over and over against anyone who crosses their paths.
Fool me once, shame on you...
Fool me twice, shame on me!...
2007-02-24 23:36:50 · answer #5 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The libs goal is to embarass the President, and demoralize the troops. What the democrats and some RINOs have done is just disgusting. It bothers me to see that elected officials do not support the troops. Did you ever see a "support the troops" act? No. They don't want that.
2007-02-24 14:01:54 · answer #6 · answered by Chopper 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The Democrats goal is to win the next elections. They simply do not care if the troops have to pay the price for this.
And when the troops dare disagree with them - they rationalize away our first-hand accounts. Even worse they try to tell us that we should be punished for disagreeing with them.
2007-02-24 14:14:18 · answer #7 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Stop being hysterical. This war is a lost cause for the United States anyway. After 6 years of complete Republican political power, ( unchecked , I may add ) , its time to strike fear in the hearts of Bush supporters everywhere by holding this administration accountable and undoing the damage it has done. We need to end Mr. Bush's War as well. He does not seem to be capable of doing this.
2007-02-24 13:48:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Without a doubt.
Threats to cut off their funds.
Threats to repeal the authorization to be there
Name calling
Kerry - troops are dumb and terrorist
Durbin - Nazis, Pol Pot
Murtha - cold blooded murders.
Obama - the dead lives are wasted.
Spitting on our troops
LA editor saying he doesn't support the troops.
2007-02-24 14:06:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
It's not us...it's all the gung-ho conservatives out there, who keep chanting..."They volunteered for it...they knew the risks"... now escort those Halliburton convoys down that IED filled road.
I would imagine that would strike fear in any fighting man's heart to know that he has to run the gauntlet every stinking day. Even Dirty Harry only had to run the gauntlet once.
2007-02-24 13:58:43 · answer #10 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋