English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean honestly, did you all drop out in the 4th grade or something? There are THOUSANDS of transitional fossils. Starting with the most famous, Archeopteryx. Here are a few links giving not only hundreds of examples, but most of them are vertebrate fossils too since some of you accept transitionals but only in invertebrates.
First up, Vertebrate Transitionals;
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html
Next, Hominids (that's OUR ancestors);
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
And last but not least, 29 evidences for MACROevolution (for those of you who think, incorrectly, that Macroevolution doesn't happen)
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html#pred4

Now, let's hope these aren't too difficult for you to understand. For those of you who REALLY want to learn but are having difficulty, ask your questions here and I'll use the edit function to reply.

2007-02-24 12:12:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

David,
LOL thanks for the laugh. "Dr" kent hovind has been thoroughly discredited, never mind that his "PHD" is as phony as he is.
But thanks for the chuckle...

2007-02-24 12:16:31 · update #1

Son of G,
You're an idiot, did you know that?
Good.

2007-02-24 12:18:53 · update #2

Christine,
Sigh, looks like I have to explain the bleedingly obvious to yet another moron.
Here goes,
Humans are related to Primates. Understand that simple fact ok? We DESCENDED from primates who then became Hominids and finally to the genus Homo. Get it? We did NOT descend directly from Primates!
They and we, share a common ancestor.
Understand now?

2007-02-24 12:21:06 · update #3

Gabbo,
I'm embarrased for the both of us. Please, just leave...

2007-02-24 12:21:39 · update #4

Michael,
You HAVE to be kidding me right? PLEASE tell me this is some puerile form of humor!
Because NO one can be that brainwashed and still have enough braincells left to push the keys on a keyboard.
Honestly, you have my pity.

2007-02-24 12:27:17 · update #5

Ramjet.
Who said we needed to GAIN genetic information? It just has to change, and that is what evolution does, it changes genetic information. Sometimes for the good, sometimes not so good.

2007-02-25 14:31:24 · update #6

10 answers

I love people who believe this. They are so easy to make fun of. Man is only 5,000 years old? Huh-wha? Imagine an intelligent design so intelligent that you nimrods can't understand it-because your book doesn't explain it to you-in between the violence and other disgusting acts in the Bible. What if a "God" of some kind said poof-there's the big bang? Is that still intelligent design or is it evolution? Both?

2007-02-24 12:14:51 · answer #1 · answered by Jason D 3 · 1 1

Ask any former evolutionist that was given the proof and had to agree that of all of the millions of fossils that are in museums around the world, there isn't ONE transitional. Your problem couldbe that you don't want to be proven wrong on anything. But don't lose hope. I have a brother who had the same opinion of himself, it was either his way or the wrong way. After years of beating his head on the wall, he woke up and he is finding out that he was only a legend in his own mind!! As for your Archeopteryx, it doesn't have any collar bones in which to anchor the muscles needed for flight. It looks magnificent for a ground roaming reptile!!

2007-02-24 12:24:19 · answer #2 · answered by michael m 5 · 0 1

dear yoda
you are too incredible to be true!
*wink*

edit
Dear yoda
in your additional details, you state -
"Humans are related to Primates."
"We DESCENDED from primates who became hominids"
"We did NOT descend directly from Primates!"

What the heck does that mean? When did we LOSE enough genetic information to develop into a completely different species of homind? Wouldn't we have had to GAIN genetic information?
And how can we have descended from primates but not have directly descended from them?
Sorry but your argument doesn't hold up at all.

2007-02-24 12:15:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

you have ranked by skill of genus, contributors of a genus are on the subject of one yet another. If people have been on the subject of the different genera does not all of them be lumped under one genus not separate ones? So the homo genus is ours. How does this show we belong to the Kenyanthropus genus?

2016-10-16 10:20:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you find a fossil, that doesn't mean there is transitional fossils.
I believe in adaptation of species, but not evolution.
If you REALLY want to learn, read the first chapters of Genesis, my good friend.

2007-02-24 12:16:57 · answer #5 · answered by Gabo 2 · 0 3

I guess all the answers in here are what was expected. The same old "goddidit".

2007-02-24 12:20:28 · answer #6 · answered by Incoherent Fool 3 · 1 1

yes, reasoning with people who say "god diddit". That'll work.

2007-02-24 12:15:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mni-SRtG7xY

2007-02-24 12:15:03 · answer #8 · answered by NONAME 3 · 0 2

The Archeopteryx has been proved it was a complete bird.

YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-02-24 12:17:56 · answer #9 · answered by son of God 7 · 0 2

GOD BLESS YOU, SO YOU THINK WE CAME FROM MONKEYS??? WELL WHO MADE THE MONKEYS?

2007-02-24 12:18:18 · answer #10 · answered by chrislynn_0089 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers