USA has under estimated those civilians killed in Iraq. 35,ooo?

Question

It was represented as a horrible number and it is. But down playing the amount of deaths in durfur said the 400,000 was way over the number killed. That it was in fact not much over 200,000
Why is it a horrible carnage to kill 35000 in Iraq. When they call the low estimate of 200,000 as nothing in durfur?
Which the UN says is untrue that the number is actually in the milions.

Answer 1

Because the conflict in Darfur is politically correct it rescues muslims from extinction and was favored by the Democrats and Bill Clinton. The iraq conflict is opposing muslims who have said they will destroy the USA if we let them. This is a politically incorrect war, because it admits that muslims are enemies and this Iraq war is supported by republicans. So Killing Civilians in Darfur is Okay, but a crime in Iraq. By the way Iraqi civilians are called terrorists. I think we should kill more of them.

Answer 2

What's a civilian? Unlike previous wars, the enemy doesn't wear a uniform. He dresses like a civilian so he can blend in with them. Women and children are also given weapons and told to fight. It's hard to make an accurate estimate about the number of civilian deaths when no one can agree on what a civilian is.

Answer 3

remember that the number of civilian deaths in Iraq is exaggerated because the people keeping the records do not distinguish between civilian, insurgent and foreign terrorists when they compile the numbers.

How can we have any faith in numbers produced by people who list a dead Al Quadea fighter from Egypt as a 'dead Iraqi civilian?'

Answer 4

I think there were a little more than just 35 "civilian" deaths in Iraq (and, incidentally, going "ooo" after that is a little disrespectful).

Answer 5

Remember this....The Republicans have been in charge so no one really cares about the deaths.

Answer 6

its 660,000