http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15593753/
2007-02-21 01:34:49 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ STDs
1) Circumcision removes a portion of the male anatomy. It decreases sensitivity. Many believe it is a form of mutilation.
2) Here in the Western world there are many ways to avoid STD's other than circumcision.
2007-02-21 01:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by leaptad 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There's no scientific evidence to back up that it cuts down on STD's. If an uncircumcised penis is kept clean, there is no problem. The circumcision is not praticed in most Europaen countries.
2007-02-21 09:39:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mightymo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's genital mutilation, and it is not PROVEN to cut down on STDs. It's more of a religious custom, and I deeply resent it! Fantasy's rant (below) is exactly what I am referring to!!
2007-02-21 09:38:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Basically stupidity. The people that usually go against it I find, are trying to make a "rebellious" statement against religion and all other forms of conformity, all the while not knowing the stupid mistakes their are making.
2007-02-21 09:40:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋