I've not been tested, but if I was going to, then I'd want a traditional Blood Test, I wouldn't trust new methods like Orasure. It is such an important test, I'd want to be as certain as possible that I'd get the correct result.
I know that Orasure claims to be as reliable, but I prefer to stick to the tried and tested methods.
2007-02-16 03:45:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have only been tested by peeing in a cup & blood tested, but I would most definetly try Orasure anyday; I HATE blood.
2007-02-16 05:52:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by sLb♥CeM 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer the orasure it is just a swab in the mouth and you get your results in a few days. It is just as accurate as a blood draw.
2007-02-22 02:54:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by kristal3962 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate needles so I prefer Orasure
2007-02-16 05:35:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Primdiva 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blood test
2007-02-23 09:51:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by I Know, I Know 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've been tested for all serious STDs (HIV, Hepatitis B and C, Syphilis) and Chlamydia by giving blood only once. 5 tests with only one occasion at the doctor, I think it really worth that little pain and patience (HIV 1 week, Chlamydia 2 weeks) if you wanna go sure about all these diseases. To go to the doctor is the easy part, to go for the results: hmmmm I was scared to death, but everybody who i asked has been trough all of this just to receive some negative results. Go for it, you will feel so much better after all. And good luck!!
2007-02-21 21:39:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rita D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would prefer blood tests. They can tell you everything!
2007-02-16 03:50:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by hollie_c_sharp64012 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
blood test
2007-02-24 02:59:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by georgespindrill 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have been tested using both methods, both were negative, so to me it doesnt matter.
2007-02-17 04:57:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋