why don't people just of organic and go HUNTING!! doesn't get more organic than that!?

Question

why don't people just of organic and go HUNTING!! doesn't get more organic than that! the only true all natural food , not farmed, not grown by people just from the earth to your table you hunt it you kill it you , you cut it up you , you cook it you eat it! you use the hide for nice work gloves about 3 good pairs and use the rest on book covers and binding. I don't know why people don't eat meat, don't be lazy and complain about animal cruenity , hasn't anyone watched the animal channels and see what other animals do to eat? wolfs kill animals just to kill them, they let them die slow , they bite into there hind quarters and there spine so they can't get away and they go for another. sometimes the animals like deer take hours if not up to days to die, seems a lot less painful and more humaine to shoot the deer in the head of heart and kill it instantley just food for thought. .. just wondering what people think about going all organic and do a little more hunting?????

Answer 1

You're comparing apples to oranges when you compare animals to humans. True, carnivores and omnivores kill each other for meat, so does that mean that we can go out and bite each other to the death? Of course not.

It's NOT NOT NOT laziness, as you erroneously claim, that keeps people from hunting. How arrogant and assuming! Perhaps you live in a rural area with woods in your back yard, but many here live in cities and do the 9 to 5 and live busy lives, and don't have TIME to hunt. Most people don't even know how to hunt. That would be like a bicyclist telling the rest of the world not to be so damn lazy for driving, and get their butts into a bicycle seat and use some sweat to get themselves somewhere. Now, if you drive, and I will safely assume you do, wouldn't a statement like THAT be ridiculous?

We are not, and I repeat, NOT physiologically designed for consuming flesh. We are designed to be herbivores, always have been, always will be. True, we can adapt to consuming flesh, but we get sick from it too. We have to COOK the meat, though, 'cause our systems are not designed to digest all that raw meat. Over time, a meat centered diet causes a plethora of diseases, like: cancer, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's, acne, heart disease, diabetes, and many others. Sure, we can eat it, but it's bad for us, bottom line.

Mankind evolves, develops, advances. We've done away with slavery, we have women's rights, education has become and continues to become more global, and more people have stopped eating animals. Yes, this IS progress. We have gained the science of nutritiion, and we can get ALL of our nutrient needs met in the plant world. Meat is no at all necessary to be healthy. Vegetarianism is part of human development, evolution, advancement.

Answer 2

Oh vegetarians, the asker of this question is just trying to get your goat. I thought of this before too...I mean hunting is better than having the animal in an environment where they are tortured. Anyway hunting is controlled, I really don't think that all of a sudden millions of people would go out hunting. I just think there needs to be people monitoring the way farmers are treating animals. It's obviously a big problem if people think the animals are being treated cruelly. Are there solutions you can come up with to stop animal cruelty?

Answer 3

relatively, SD is not extra appropriate than food market nutrition. it relatively is on a par. The least i will say approximately it relatively is that high quality varies between this classification of nutrition, even interior of manufacturers. you relatively could evaluate each and each nutrition via itself reward. yet that stated, sure, organic and organic hen may be a large nutrition on your cat. it won't be able to be in basic terms that on my own, nonetheless. you will might desire to complement to make specific the nutrition habitual is balanced. right it relatively is a link to my weblog on uncooked feeding. It would not supply all the solutions yet I even have links the place you may learn extra. And whilst organic and organic may be stable, it relatively is not strictly mandatory in case you prefer to shrink expenses. EDIT: i've got been away for a whilst yet I see little has replaced. Myths and incorrect suggestion nonetheless abound. And the naysayers nonetheless do no longer supply backup for what they declare. you may feed uncooked meat AND commercial ingredients, even kibble. Kibble isn't a large determination, of direction, and that i would not serve them on the comparable time, yet you may feed the two. Cats' digestive systems are extra appropriate waiting to shelter uncooked meat than a human's. you will hit upon recipes that use cooked meats, yet you're on your very own there - i won't be able to help you. Making your very own nutrition using cooked meats continues to be a step above even the superb commercial nutrition, yet uncooked is much extra appropriate than that. warmth kills off food.

Answer 4

Great idea around 200 years ago.
With the population nowdays it would only take a few days to kill off all the wildlife we have. Then we would all starve to death. Thats the reason beef and poultry etc... is mass produced.

Answer 5

That's a great idea! Wolves need to eat other animals to survive and are unable to kill them nicely; therefore, we should kill animals too!

Answer 6

Animals eat animals because there is nothing elsefor them to eat. Us on the other hand have plenty of veggies to eat so we dont need to take someone else's food.

Answer 7

I don't know where you came up with your ideas, but they are erroneous.

Answer 8

True.

Answer 9

Why kill if you don't have to?