2007-02-03 13:03:21 · 29 answers · asked by cora D 1 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Diabetes
No, I wouldn't want to live to be that old unless it could be guaranteed that I would still have all my faculties and be fully functioning.
2007-02-07 05:26:45 · answer #1 · answered by huggz 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes - 120 will be the new 50
2007-02-03 13:06:22 · answer #2 · answered by corporatetrade 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I could have the knowledge and insight that living 120 yrs brings, and the body and stamina I had at 18 or 20 yrs. YOU CAN BET YOUR SWEET BIPPIE I WOULD!!!
2007-02-03 13:15:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends. What are the circumstances? How will my health be? 120 and healthy and active, or 120 and struggling to stay alive?
2007-02-03 13:06:52 · answer #4 · answered by Master Maverick 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well if everyone keeps passing the problems to the next generation because "they will be better equipped to fix the problems made by us", such as global warming, diseases, cancers etc. I don't think so. For those religous ones out there, I don't want to prolong staying here when i can go elsewhere
2007-02-03 13:24:54 · answer #5 · answered by fairy tink 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
220
2007-02-03 13:10:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I first thought is NEVER but then thinking about the chance to see my kids grown and my grand-kids grow is a neat idea, so i 'm not sure. Suppose it would depend some on my health to what fun is living if you cant live fully.
2007-02-03 13:10:17 · answer #7 · answered by survivedlasvegas 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No way, if you have not done all of the good that you can do in the world by the time you are 80, it is time to give it up. I have 10 more years to think of what else good I can do.
2007-02-03 15:20:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would. Someone from the old generation needs to be around to guide the new generation. They're not off to a good start, around here anyway. Plus I think it would be fun sticking around long enough to see if the mullett ever comes back in style. ;)
2007-02-03 13:15:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anna Hennings 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes,as long as I'm happy and healthy. If I'm suffering from a terrible disease that made me not enjoy life. If you gave me 200 years to live I would rather die instead. The pain goes anyway
2007-02-03 13:11:58 · answer #10 · answered by 12348 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, as long as I could be healthy and not a vegetable. I would prefer to have my wits about me, strength enough to fend and take care of myself and enough money to be happy. I guess if I just had family alive at that age I'd be happy..so YES.
2007-02-03 13:07:05 · answer #11 · answered by Betty Boop 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋