English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-29 09:54:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink Vegetarian & Vegan

and why not

2007-01-29 10:00:31 · update #1

10 answers

No. That would be some kinda freaked up "playing God" experiment that I would want no part of. If I wouldn't eat a regular cow, I sure wouldn't eat a Frankenstein cow.

2007-01-29 10:04:19 · answer #1 · answered by lovely 5 · 1 0

" No, Meat with out any fat would be rather taste less and very
dry .."

" But if the Cow had no Brain the cow wouldn't move with
out commands from the brain so it would be very Tender, It
might be good for Stirfry's, Casseroles and other wet dishes
that are cooked in a rich ,tasty sauce ."

" But than Genetically altered food might be BAD for you,
You might as well eat 2-minute noodles or something similar
with not real nutrition value ."

2007-01-29 11:26:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

the terrific reaction isn't any reaction , i grew to become into like that as baby until eventually ultimately my mid 1930s , 6' 2 " a hundred sixty five lbs and then got here weight gradually . you have a intense metabolism and it will decelerate as you get greater mature . What might want to assert to those people ? decrease your self to their point !!! could be an hassle-free answer could be , i like to the way i'm . thank you for the compliment . i'm not sure this might help , yet you have a advantageous day .

2016-09-28 04:05:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

what we need to do is eat the aborted fetuses...starting from at least 7 months in the womb. that way the calf doesn't have time to fatten up and you get the advantage of having the leanest and most tender cuts..also the brain doesn't have time to develop and the cow won't be cognizant of the fact that it was going to be raised as people fodder. this is the perfect way for vegetarians to eat meat without the guilt that arises from consuming a fellow mammal with an intelligence as impressive as theirs.

2007-01-29 12:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by dragonaudra 2 · 0 1

Besides the fact that an animal without a brain that is more complex than a single celled organism cannot survive, meat still has negative health implications. So no.

2007-01-29 14:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Beef would taste icky with out some sort of fat involved. The brain part makes no difference to me except of course if they could guarantee mad cow free.

2007-01-29 10:00:51 · answer #6 · answered by Steph 5 · 0 2

Hell no. It would be some bizarro science experament. We've got enough of those going around.

Tomato spliced with animal genes in an attempt to give it a "will to live." Didn't they see the movie????

Pork spliced to worm genes to give it Omega 3s.

Corn spliced to poisonous bacteria so that it produces it's own pesticide?

I am NOT a petri dish.

2007-01-29 10:18:05 · answer #7 · answered by Max Marie, OFS 7 · 5 0

ew no! as a vegetarian, i believe in food that is NATURAL. beef without a brain would have to be genetically engineered and that's not a good thing.

2007-01-29 12:35:19 · answer #8 · answered by YSIC 7 · 0 0

No. I don't think "beef" should be a word.
Call it what is carrion.

2007-01-29 10:15:59 · answer #9 · answered by Standing Stone 6 · 2 0

no

2007-01-29 09:58:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers