What reason do you have to believe you are infected with HIV? If you have had a high risk encounter, then by all means get retested in a few months to ease your mind. Or, get a different type of HIV test, most likely you had the ELISA test, this is generally the one used for initial screenings and it is very accurate and inexpensive. The Western Blot is used to confirm positives on the ELISA. There is also a p24 antigen test which measures a specific protein of the virus in the blood. An RNA viral load test is used to measure the quantity of viral RNA in the blood in HIV+ individuals. There is also a newer test called the PCR which looks for HIV genetic information, however it is expensive and not widely available.
However, if this was a routine screen, trust that you are negative and no need to worry. I'll try to explain even though I'm a little fuzzy on it myself: antibody levels in the blood are calculated as ratios of the sample rate divided by the cutoff (= negative control). A sample is considered non-reactive if the ratio <1, and reactive when the ratio ≥ 1. The addition of substances to the test sample will generate a florescent signal which is read and transformed into a numeric signal. This is compared to an automated assay cutoff, providing a qualitative result based on the serum/cutoff ratio (or S/CO) ratio. The result is deemed positive when the S/CO ratio is greater than or equal to 1. The assay cutoffs are usually determined at each run, and can vary slightly per assay but yours was well within the negative range.
Anyway, kind of complicated, but please, anytime you have a question about your test results, please ask your health care professional right on the spot. Don't leave until they have explained it to your satisfaction so you don't have to go home and worry about it.
2007-01-27 00:07:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by BabyRN 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
I'm uncertain...i comprehend for a actuality that HIV tests that count selection your viral load can diploma undetectable however the affected person remains effective. The viral load is a length of how many gadgets of the virus are got here across interior of a million milliliter of blood. The AMA has set a usual viral load it incredibly is seen undetectable at under 20 gadgets or copies of the virus in line with a million milliliter of blood. Analytical sensitivity on your try of 53iu/ml is affirming that your try will basically properly perceive the virus interior of your equipment in case you have a minimum of fifty 3 copies of the virus in line with a million ml. for this reason you have under fifty 3 gadgets on your blood so it shows undetectable. That doesn't mean you're unfavorable unavoidably, provided that's attainable to have under fifty 3 on your blood and nonetheless have the virus. besides..HIV is likewise on your organs, which that try doesn't account for. So u could have a doctor the two flow over your consequences or have a try with better analytical sensitivity to confirm.
2016-11-01 10:03:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, you most likely dont have HIV.... these tests are not 100% but they are 99% accurate.... 0.53 means you tested below 1%.
2007-01-27 00:01:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have no clue but I am sure you can find the answer on line, don't worry though, not yet, it was negative so that is good.
2007-01-26 23:59:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you have to get tested periodically, caue it can take months to show up. I dont know what ur no.s mean. heard of google???
2007-01-27 01:31:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a person with such an honored and beautiful name as YUSUF should NOT be a person who can get infected w/HIV as you should be avoiding any behaviour that would put you at risk for that.Reflect.
2007-01-27 00:14:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by FoudaFaFa 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ask your Doctor.. but no I do not think you have HIV.
2007-01-27 00:00:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mizhani 5
·
0⤊
1⤋