English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here's a snip it of an article.http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_21259218.shtml

Meanwhile, Bush encourages millions of child molesters, drunks, pregnant mothers, drug runners, people smugglers and terrorists breaching America's borders unchecked. He pretends to keep the nation safe knowing full well he is not. Is this not a form of insanity? Is this not a form of walking naked into the night?

In history, everyone waits for someone to stand up, to speak the truth or to sound the fire alarm. Today, as American citizens stand up, they suffer the ignominious rants of being called "racists" by what I call the "Anti-American Opposition." Who are they?

The Anti-American opposition controls CBS, NBC, ABC, Wal-Mart, Tyson, MacDonald's, Wendy's and all corporations that support or employ illegal aliens.

Rocky Mountain News publisher John Temple, Atlanta Constitution Editor Cynthia Tucker, publishers of the New York Times and Wall Street Journal may be named the Anti-American opposition. The Los Angeles Times does everything in its power to support, aid and abet illegal aliens.

Senators McCain, Kennedy, Specter, Feinstein, Hagel, Martinez, Salazar, Reid and dozens of others support illegal aliens against American citizens and the rule of law. House members Pelosi, Cannon, Baca, Udall, Degette and hundreds more make up Anti-American opposition members. They subvert the U.S. Constitution.

2007-01-15 23:15:45 · 7 answers · asked by rdyjoe 4 in Politics & Government Immigration

7 answers

Hey, wake up. The majority of our representatives supporting illegal immigration are Democrats. Check it out. How about Gore's 'mass citizenship'? Isn't it the liberal judges that let illegals off and they commit the same crimes over and over again. The Democrats are the Socialists and want U.S. citizens to pay for illegals.

Just heard TOM TANCREDO, a Republican adamently opposed to illegal immigration has just begun an exploratory committee about running for President. I'll have to check out the rest of his record but at this point he would be my choice of both Dems and Republicans running.

2007-01-16 00:44:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

That is quite a bit of journalistic jumping around. After reading the article though, I must take issue with its author calling the US "...a living hell." I should think that would be Baghdad.

2007-01-16 07:40:40 · answer #2 · answered by Lyn 6 · 4 0

If you keep talking about this issue in simplistic and rhetorical terms the solution you ultimately get will be equally simplistic (i.e. political).

2007-01-16 09:21:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Question or State of the Union Address???????

While I am not sure I agree with all of your points....
Thumbs up.

2007-01-16 07:25:08 · answer #4 · answered by jetero41 3 · 4 1

Hey, I like what you have to say. Well done.

2007-01-17 00:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by Princess_29_71 3 · 2 0

Thank you for posting this, do it daily for the slow learners please

2007-01-16 07:22:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

where is the question in this ?.................oh_hell

2007-01-16 07:43:54 · answer #7 · answered by oh_hell_imagine_that 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers