When it comes to sending our sons and daughters into combat for a mistake that he made. I fought in Vietnam and I have a nephew who died in Iraq. He never set foot on foreign soil in combat. It would have put a crimp in his happy hour.
2007-01-15 18:38:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No, Bush is pretty much the definition of a coward.
What follows is simply my opinion.
Bush just doesn't care at this point. He already has his second term, and the republicans already lost their majority; so now he is trying to save his name in the history books. Pulling out might be what is right and what the people want, but he goes down as making a mistake from which no good has come. As it stands now he is the man who started our second Vietnam, but if he somehow instills a Shite run government that is in our favor and somehow stabilizes the region he'll still come out smelling of roses. Of course that is all a pipe dream.
I fought in the war and for a time I thought it was the right thing, but the fact of the matter is that we have overstayed our place there. We gutted the government out of their country so we needed to stay until another suitable one was in place. However if the Sunnis don't want to participate in the new government, that will never happen. They want a civil war and that is their country's ordeal, not ours. Bush's upping our troops over there is a desperate attempt to save his name and that is it.
Sending others to pay for your mistakes makes you a bigger coward than I have anything to compare to.
2007-01-15 18:59:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
specific, from time to time! yet, additionally George W. Bush is the 6th King in Rev. 17:10 who's spoken of interior the present annoying! because of the fact while he replace into in workplace in 2001 there have been 5-x presidents who have been nonetheless alive, and one is yet to return, replace into Obama! The angel Gabriel advised me that Jimmy Carter is the Anti-Christ and that he is going to alter his call and divorce his spouse! Obama is going to die first and then the Anti-Christ who replace into between the previous 7 Presidents will take his place! Rev. 17:10 And there are seven kings: 5 are fallen, and one is, [and] the different isn't yet come; and while he cometh, he might desire to proceed a quick area. those 7 kings have been; a million. Gerald Ford 2. Jimmy Carter 3. Ronald Reagan 4. George H. W. Bush 5. invoice Clinton 6. George W. Bush.... is spoken of interior the present annoying (and one is) because of the fact till Reagan died all 7 have been alive! 7. Barack Obama.......and one is yet to return! he will die some days after he will boost taxes! Obama is likewise in Dan. eleven:20 Then shall get up in his sources a raiser of taxes [in] the know of the dominion: yet interior few days he would be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in conflict. Rev. 17:eleven And the beast that variety into, and is not, even he's the 8th, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. The angel Gabriel advised me in Aug. 1973 that Jimmy Carter replace into the Anti-Christ and that he is going to alter his call and divorce his spouse! Obama is going to die first, and then the Anti-Christ, who replace into between the previous 7 Presidents will take his place!
2016-10-07 05:48:17 · answer #2 · answered by shimp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Middle East will never be peaceful without ending the Israeli occupation. This is the conclusion of the UN, EU, Backer-Hamilton report, and President Carter new book.
2007-01-15 18:42:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
When he was asked to serve in Vietnam he went AWOL.
http://www.awolbush.com/
When the WTC was hit he went to a a BUNKER in Nebraska
the same thing with Dick and the most of the neocon.
A really BRAVE man
2007-01-15 20:17:47 · answer #4 · answered by Temsah 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not incredibly but un-necessarily brave.
He is unable to digest the progress made by his nation and wants to show to the world how much wrong he can do to undo the progress so far made.
It is his belief that down-hill journey has to be faster than the uphill, that has been done by his predecessors.
2007-01-15 18:52:48 · answer #5 · answered by Saadi 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Neither did Clinton set foot on foreign soil in combat. Nor Nixon,Reagen,FDR,Hoover,Coolidge, orWilson,...what's your point?
2007-01-15 18:52:32 · answer #6 · answered by Sartoris 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nam had smack; George is a cocaine man. Expect war in South America under his watch.
2007-01-15 18:49:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I hope so, that is why he went into hiding soon after 911
2007-01-15 18:43:31 · answer #8 · answered by inin 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
what family member of his is in the service now?? I haven't heard anything..........
2007-01-15 18:47:23 · answer #9 · answered by chocolate smoke 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes,one of the finest president
2007-01-15 18:49:32 · answer #10 · answered by di_cassano 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋