If wars are necessary, I must accept.
I personally believe they are necessary because truth can only be reached through conflict. Everyone has their own purpose. Contrast between Good and evil brings light to people who can recognize it. Some people sacrifice themselves for the benefit of others, if that is their purpose.
2007-01-15 18:19:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pamela 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
If I really have a gun the probabilities that someone will attack me (understanding that i'm armed) are low. to make investments contained in the protection rigidity is to educate the aggressive countries of the international that we are prepared to look after ourselves if mandatory. that doesn't propose that we ought to continually implement our protection rigidity forces for any reason (which i'm particular we may all agree or disagree at the same time as it contains the guy circumstances as we glance at them traditionally or presently). Peace is an recommendations-blowing idea. however that's unrealistic to anticipate that if we throw away our purely protection (the protection rigidity/guns) that others will do the same. we stay in a international with those who will gladly scouse borrow and kill. it isn't a extraordinarily idea, however that's real. to allow an enemy to oppress us isn't peace. Religions are after what they offer idea to "fact". with information from definition it must be unique. that doesn't propose they are warfare mongering. i understand peace-loving muslims who're human beings. And solid Mormons who've shown others tremendous kindness, even although they did not carry the same beliefs. there's a significant distinction between peace and letting someone walk throughout you, (oppression).
2016-12-02 08:44:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have to accept that fact. And, The only way to insure peace, is to always be ready for war, and have more and better stuff than they have.
(That's why the Russians never attacked us, but then, Al Quida isn't the smartest chicken in the coop.)
2007-01-15 18:15:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Middle East will never be peaceful without ending the Israeli occupation. This is the conclusion of the UN, EU, Backer-Hamilton report, and President Carter new book.
2007-01-15 18:26:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
War is an evil un-necessarily imposed by a powerful onto a known weaker enemy.
Had Iraq possessed WMDs, Israel would have advised USA not to go for a venture there as their existence would have been at stake.
It is a power game.
Beasts learn it from humans and practice in Jungles.
2007-01-15 18:43:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Saadi 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I accept it, Im unapologetic, and I participate. I am a cruel beast bloodthirsty and viscious. I will lie, cheat, steal, rape, and kill for my comforts and I will see to it that anyone stupid enough to stand in my way sees every form of pain and suffering the world has to offer.
2007-01-15 18:57:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yep. But if you're saying Iraq was necessary, I disagree.
2007-01-15 18:09:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Communication breakdown, its always the same, having a nervous breakdown, let the bombs reign.
2007-01-15 18:13:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I sadly accept.
2007-01-15 18:09:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
-----Wars are not evil, they just exist. Sometimes you just have to fight. ---Jim
2007-01-15 18:15:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by James M 4
·
2⤊
0⤋