People watch reality television, too. And have you read most of the questions and answers on this site? There, I think you're starting to get it. Yep, that's right: People are stupid as hell.
2007-01-15 17:49:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by FlashesOfBrilliance 1
·
5⤊
3⤋
Well everything relates in one way or another, yet science in that respect is not 100% correct either, in terms of evolution. The problem is they keep trying to relate the ape to man. I bet there's atleast one or maybe 2 missing links that they've not discovered yet, if it even exists. There's not enough evidence to support the evolution theory completely.
Man being made from clay or dust is silly.
Eve being transformed from Adam's rib is ridiculous.
Either it was translated wrong due to chicken scratch under a drunken haze by the author, or some poetic dream to fill in the space for a "beginning".
2007-01-16 02:10:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by fancypantsy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If evolutionists were only able to see how many lies have gone into shoring up the theory of evolution, the fossils and rocks circular reasoning fallacy, the anomalies that don’t fit into the theory and are swept under the table, the fact that evolution can’t prove that a species has ever evolved into another species, the fact that the concept of carbon dating is based on 2 fallacies. What would it take to convince man who is inherently sinful that there is no God? As Richard Dawkins says “circumstantial evidence.”
On the other hand it only takes the faith of a child to believe in God.
2007-01-16 01:59:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by hisgloryisgreat 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dust you are and to dust you shall return. You can't refute that scientifically. When you die that's exactly all that's left physically and your body returns to the clay (earth, dust). Hey, it's God we are talking about here. He can give clay any kind of unique properties He wants and He did so. I haven't seen anyone who could match His creative and artistic talents ever. Not even close. It was just all in a day's work for Him. Hmm. You sure don't mind taking off work on the Sabbath just like God did and instructed His people to do as well. I think all atheists should volunteer to work on the Sabbath since they do not believe in God. (just kidding!)
2007-01-16 02:03:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lovin' Mary's Lamb 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religion says man is made out of clay. Evolution says life came out of a clay bog with amino acids floating around in it. Religion says that God breathed life into the man formed out of clay. How does evolution account for the first spark of life?
2007-01-16 01:58:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lukusmcain// 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The billions in time is before the garden of Eden and the genealogy of Jesus, the one to save all that was lost in Eden and the loss of the life sustaining earth.
If people want to be into evolution, let it be, it is not my problem to deal with the billions of years they are interested in.
I do eat food out of the dust of the earth that has the same elements in it that the earth does that man is made out of.
Adam must have been in love with adam, God made him a mate, He said, this is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh. He got what he wanted.
2007-01-16 02:04:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by jeni 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only part of evolution that I am critical of is of humans from apes. That has not been proven. Scientists have come up with this 'missing link' to try and support why their theory is true. All it does is show me that people did not come from apes or they would have found this link by now. As for the evolution of other animals, I believe that, because there is actual proof, whether it be skeletal remains, bones, etc.
2007-01-16 01:51:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Nana of Nana's 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No one should unquestioningly accept anything. An individual should read lots, ponder over the earth's beauty; its plants, animals & landscape around us, then make up their own mind.
2007-01-16 02:02:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by louarty_07 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The thing about this story is that they seem to believe that adam had his rib taken, and that for some reason this trait was passed on to all males afterwards. Can anyone say Lamarkian evolution?
2007-01-16 01:53:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Scientists are critical of evolution. It just happens to have passed all their tests.
What I don't get is how Bible believers can opposed stem cell research. Stem cells can be derived from ribs.
2007-01-16 02:34:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋