What else can a country do to prove they have no WMD, hence to avoid unfair attack by US/UN?

Question

What shall a country do to prove they dont have WMD?
In order to prevent the people/country being attacked by US, for just being wrongly accused of having WMD?

OK, it is fair if US/UN attack a defiant leader/country that posses WMD.

But what about a country being acused, actually they do not have one? What else can the country do to prove?

Example: Iraq admitted they have no WMD as claimed by US/UN.
US/UN do not satisfied, and demand Iraq to OPEN their country for UN/US inspectors. In order to SATISFY the world, Iraq welcomed and agreed to let the UN/US inspect FREELY every inch of its soil. Nothing was found.

The people and children who have already suffered (More than 300,000 children of Iraq died because of the sanction- no supply of medicine), crippled and undermined by the 10 years UN sanctions.

What else can a country do to prove and prevent from being attack by US?

By the way, how come a country admitted to have WMD, not being attacked by US?

Answer 1

send cheney some free diesel and get george some new crayons

Answer 2

The US invaded Iraq not because of WMD's, but because Saddam broke the conditions of the armistice from the First Gulf War. He also bribed UN, French, German and Russian leaders so that he could get out from under the UN Inspections a sanctions and he could continue with his WMD research programs.

It's funny how safe everybody thinks undeclared Sarin Gas, Mustard Gas and tons of yellow cake are, incidentally.

PS: Qaddafi ring a bell? Some of the long range missiles in stock were purchased by Saddam from North Korea.

Answer 3

As the only peaceful way is the UN which that is in the hand of US, I see no more way to prevent US from attacking a country by any means but to support Al-Qaeda to stop America.

Every body knows that most of the terrorist groups are coming from Pakistan and most of Terrorist attacks are justified by instability that Israel has created in middle-east and other parts of the world, but none of these two countries has been punished neither by UN nor by US, although both countries are armed with weapons of mass destruction and already leaked it to other countries like south Korea, China and others…

Answer 4

Since every one is making his own news agency I can make my own.

The US invaded Iraq because G.W. Bush wanted to Invade.

the country was open to inspectors and everyone who inspected there told us there is no weapon but Bush did not want to believe them.

Remember all the lies in the UN security council about
1- WMD
2- Iraq link with Al Qeeidah

and now people are dieing on both sides but the US oil companies will get their share of Iraqi oil.

Answer 5

One thing you have wrong. Mr Blix and the U.N. inspectors were turned away from facilities on a regular basis. I guess you weren't paying attention to the news.

The mistakes made by Pres. Clinton and Pres. Bush was not turning those facilities into smoking holes in the ground the moment the inspectors were clear.

Sadam would have gotten the message then and there would have been no need for this war.

Answer 6

Its very simple. Just let the UN inspectors in to do their job. Don;t play cat and mouse with the UN inspectors like Saddam did. Saddam thought that if he made the world believe that he had WMD that he would not be attacked. He lied and got what he deserved.

Answer 7

Saddam used nerve gas against the Kurds in northern Iraq and against the Iranians in their war during the 80s.So we do know he had them...the question is where are they now? Thats the weak link. He couldnt use them despite his threats, because any attempt at regaining power over Iraq would rest on his conduct of the war. If he used bio weapons he would not be able to gain a multinational backing to restore him to power in the case of overthrow by a foreign power. The question is where did he stash them?

Answer 8

You are wrong about this part "Iraq welcomed and agreed to let the UN/US inspect FREELY every inch of its soil."

Saddam would not let the inspectors go where ever they want like he was supposed to. So what do you expect us to think?

Answer 9

WELL, for one thing........IRAQ CLAIMED they had WMD and then wouldn't let the UN check. If you say you have a gun and then tell a police officer that he can't check your car for it......what's gonna happen? Your a$$ is gonna be on the ground in handcuffs. Can't you see that Iraq had this all planned out.....kinda like a guy running from the cops in a car, eventually being pulled over and pointing a cap gun at the cops and getting killed. Yeah, the gun was not real......but who knew how stupid that moron was to invite such violence. Come on all you liberals.......get a life.

Answer 10

American's consistently enjoyed conflict from 232 years in the past till as we communicate we attempt to act like Pacificst yet faster or later a countr comes against us and we ought to bypass to conflict..DON"T TREAD ON ME Viet Nam and Korea might have been prevented..those have been stupid Iraq? probably as we ought to consistently have waited Sadaam Hussein out and there exchange right into a no fly zone and the sanctions have been in place like with Cuba? Going into Iraq by using ourselves and NO UN help exchange right into a mistake..yet all wars might have been prevented in case you think of approximately it different than possibly WW II..