If Bangladesh does not co-operate will India be justified in taking unilateral action in self defence?

Question

Bangla Desh knows and knowingly allows the ULFA leaders from Assam to have a haven in Dhaka and training camps in the bordering areas. India after having suffered so much and the North-East region is not attracting industries due to insurgency in Assam, Nagaland, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh, why India not taking steps to flush out anti-Indian forces from Bangla Desh as it did in Bhutan two years back.

Answer 1

International law applies to the weak and not to the stronger between the two. Some one has also cautioned not to have so many enemies. Bangladesh will surrender in two days of attack. India will be fully justified to attack Bangladesh and flash out the ULFA leaders and pressurise Bangladesh to freeze the bank accounts with the criminally obtained property.

Answer 2

I have seen a series of your Questions in Y!A and identical Answers given by a few of your zealous countrymen. It seems that all on a sudden Bangladesh became the focus of your attention when we are having some internal quarrelling between our feuding main political parties, and the one favoured by India is apparently on the losing end.

War with Bangladesh will no longer be as cut-and-dry as shooting all the bad guys of ULFA (if at all they are housed here) and going home. Please bear it in mind that this war with Bangladesh cannot be won by sheer force alone. History would bear us out that you may enter in Bengal terrain at your will but you may not be that lucky to get out if the people starts resisting your invasion. Remember a few years back when our Sk. Hasina was the PM and the invading BSF Jawans were defeated by the BDR where about 17 invaders were slain in our soils and brought back to India through diplomatic efforts. They are also about ideas and ideology. In this world where India is trying to get a seat in UN Security Council, wars with neighbors are not just about guns and military actions.

I wish your BSF could stay home safely and never think of intruding inside our soil again. You have jumped the warship many times and you will be out on your own. Please have the sense, the courtesy, and the human decency to go sink to the bottom alone somewhere in the Bay of Bengal.

You seem to be garnering deep rooted hatred towards this tiny neighbor though there are a lot of foreign missions (Embassies and High-Commissions included) who are monitoring every nuts and bolts of our system of governance on day-to-day basis. Had your allegations been true then your High Commissioners could have given these a top priority rather than interfering in our internal matters.

Yesterday the newly appointed Indian HC told our reporters following a meeting with Awami League President Sk. Hasina that “India wants to see a fair and acceptable election in Bangladesh”. Would you accept such interference or unwanted ‘advice’ from say Pakistani or any of the SAARC member states on your election and such internal matters?

Please do not believe what your government and presses (printing as well as electronic media) are telling you. These are outright lie and they are looking into an opportunity to fish in the troubled water of Bangladesh. Could you be a bit modest while posting your next barrage of questions in Y!A inciting hatred and saber rattling?

Answer 3

India cannot cross border to annihilate the insurgents thereat because it is a violation of International Law. India must convince Bangladesh not to give haven and training camps to insurgents.

Answer 4

USA and Israel have already set the example as to how a State can protect the lives of its citizens. India will be fully justified to flash out its wanted criminals if a neighbouring country is not co-operating.

Answer 5

"I had an altercation with a stranger simply by fact he merely approximately knocked me off my motorbike." Yeah - 'merely approximately'. He did not knock you off. "the stranger rang the police that i exchange into threatening him." ok - YOU threatened HIM. that's not his fault. "the stranger got here returned capturing of me which I informed him to give up on quite a few activities" The stranger did this simply by fact, in case you had run off at a similar time as he exchange into capturing, or earlier the police have been given there, he had to teach the police who it exchange into who were threatening him. "i went as much as him and hit his fone after telling him to give up taking my photographs then a combat started" Your fault returned. you do not hit their telephone out of their hand. no choose. "he strangled me" He would not have achieved this, even even though it exchange into your fault. You started it. "i bit him on his arm" purely this bit is self-protection. each thing else isn't. You spoke back your guy or woman question.

Answer 6

Every country has the right to self defense and to protect its citizens.

Answer 7

First try to cleanup the mess inside before creating more enemies.