O.J. Simpson was a victim of racist police who planted the evidence there. I'm not saying all of the white police where racist, but there were defintely some. Other than the DNA evidence, there is basically NOTHING that connects O.J. to the crime.
And don't you think that there would have been more blood found in his personal possessions if he did do it? I think that the white people in this country that were pissed off that they didn't nail another black man when he was found innocent were disgusting. You weren't there. You don't know all the facts. All we do know is that one of the detectives there was a racist and that the blood there was probably planted. I mean the glove didn't even come CLOSE to fitting O.J.
2007-01-15 06:56:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
IN MY OPINION I THINK OJ IS GUILTY, BUT HE GOT LUCKY HE GOT AWAY WITH IT.
2007-01-15 07:00:45 · answer #1 · answered by PRETTYGIRL 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
O.J. Simpson got away with murder.
Why do so many African Americans continue to use the race card every time ANY situation arises. This man was let to be free. And you're complaining about race?! If he were Asian, Polish, Italian or any other ethnic background person - who would be saying "the police were racist against the Polish guy"?!
Give it up all ready. The race card is played so often that it's no wonder people of other races are prejudice. People like you cause the problem and blame the world for it's outlook on this topic.
2007-01-15 07:18:37 · answer #2 · answered by Paige2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is a huge difference between being found not guilty and being innocent. Furman may have been a racist but it would have taken more than just him to plant the evidence. As far as the glove fitting or not fitting, if that was the deciding factor for the jury, then obviously DNA is not enough . Did you consider OJ had to wear plastic gloves under those gloves when he was asked to try them on in court? Take your favourite tight fitting gloves, try wearing plastic gloves and putting your other pair on. I guarantee you that they will no longer fit. OJ sure acted guilty up until the verdict, would an innocent person act that way. I doubt it.
2007-01-15 07:10:31 · answer #3 · answered by Bob D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Really, all that matters is that he went to trial and was found not guilty. People should give it a rest, unless they themselves happen to have surprise evidence that would warrant re-opening of the investigation. If anybody else were tried like that and found not guilty, that'd be the end of it and they could get back to their lives. This guy's a celebrity (or was, before the case wrecked his life), so nobody can ever let it rest. It's done and over. We can all have our own opinions, flawed or not, right or wrong. But the court made their decision. Too many of us think we can make a better decision based on what we've seen on TV, than the judge did, based on the evidence presented to him in court -some of which never got on TV. We don't know all the details of that car-chase either, and what his mindset was while it was happening. We can only surmise and speculate -which obviously, the judge and jury did not do.
My view- lay it to rest and get over it. It's old news.
2007-01-15 07:15:21 · answer #4 · answered by BuddyL 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did you just wake up from a verrrry long coma?
If not, then
WHAT ARE YOU WHINING ABOUT???
The man is free! FREE! F-R-E-E!!! DUH!
Why, he's so free, he even started writing a book about how he was so NOT guilty that even if he WAS guilty, this is how he'd have killed those people.
Not only is the man free, but he is a bona fide, certifiable IDIOT!
What kind of man with kids writes a book about how he WOULD HAVE killed his kids' mother?
So, nevermind the racist B.S. And look at the man. He's a self-proven nutcase - freako - idiot. But he was found innocent, so he's an innocent nutcase - freako - idiot.
You ought to read the newspaper once in a while.
2007-01-15 07:30:27 · answer #5 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Do you recommend "or accountable?" and also you disregarded Asian. There are in effortless words 3 races so that you made it more durable for not something. Oh, and there is no hyphen in African American. And African American isn't a race. accountable, black.
2016-11-24 19:33:41 · answer #6 · answered by schook 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the SOB got "AWAY" WITH MURDER, you fool/once again the poor lil black person(s) act like they do because "SOCIETY" is against US. We have more opportunities and more organizations to help US out than the "WHITE" ever will. When are some of OUR FOLKS ever gonna learn WE CHOOSE TO LIVE OUR LIFE the way we do----------NO ONE HAS FORCED US--------especially the whites.
2007-01-16 12:57:02 · answer #7 · answered by nickle 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A jury of his "peers" said he was.
Maybe you could post some more stuff to try and insight racial tensions on MLK day. It is the perfect way to commemorate the day.
2007-01-15 07:03:00 · answer #8 · answered by C B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
O come on! Seriously, O.J's wife had already told everyone how insane he was, and how he was harrasing her. It's no surprise he did it.
2007-01-15 07:03:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I see what you're saying, but how do you explain OJs reaction (trying to escape down the freeway).
2007-01-15 07:00:32 · answer #10 · answered by pantocool 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was found guilty in a civil court. Guilt is guilt no matter how you stack the evidence.
2007-01-15 07:04:04 · answer #11 · answered by LadySable 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋