And why is our media not talking about this among many other major stories?
2007-01-15 05:56:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It's not killing them, only making them sick, did you see the statistics of birth defects increases in Iraq since the first gulf war? the media doesn't cover it because... local weather is a much bigger story?
2007-01-15 06:03:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
they shore are when the guys come home and the do the nasty the babys are deformed and limes are gone the skin is brocken and as blake as tar, that that,s for the white babys you should leson to the xzone radio show 9 oclock est, 12 midnight at the west.there was even a prodition to stop useing uranium, on the xzone last year.
2007-01-15 06:09:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the idea is to kill the others troops, there is a reason why we dont go around old tank wreckages, because of the uranium. I would rather it be used on their soil than on our soil.
2007-01-15 06:02:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it is not.
There is a lot of hype about the material that depends on your never having had any classes in physics or chemistry. If you have had those classes (or even know how to read an MSDS) you would be aware that DU is no more dangerous to humans than lead.
2007-01-15 06:32:13 · answer #4 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
as far as i know ive never heard of anyone dieing over here from DU. some people early on in the war got posioned after they had to move derilict junk that had been hit by a DU round, but of anyone dieing no.
plus DU rounds arent used in theater anymore haven been for awhile
2007-01-15 06:02:49 · answer #5 · answered by trionspectre666 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Both if badly used.
2007-01-15 06:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, but it is killing theirs!
2007-01-15 06:00:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋