^US Airways has no 747s! and they probably won't.
Air France: Paris-Montreal, Rio de Janeiro, New York City,Washington Dulles
British Airways: London Heathrow-New York City, Johannesburg, Shanghai, Bombay, Lagos ,Tokyo Narita.
Lufthansa: Frankfurt-Toronto, Washington Dulles, Chicago O'Hare
United: San Fransisco-Beijing, Hong Kong, Tokyo Narita. Chicago O'Hare-Tokyo Narita
KLM: Amsterdam-Paramaibo, Toronto, Los Angeles, Tokyo Narita, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta, Aruba, Beijing, Houston, Mexico City
TAAG: Luanda-Lisbon
Qantas: Sydney-Brisbane, Los Angeles, San Fransisco, Singapore.
Virgin Atlantic: London Gatwick-Orlando, Nassau.
TONS MORE, thats just the tip of the iceberg
2007-01-15 04:03:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on the airline. Some airlines use boeing 747s for their long haul routes while others use airbus 330 etc. Only a travel agency can tell you the type of aircraft before making a booking. The online sites will tell you after you book what aircraft you're going on. You can however go into a travel agency and request to travel on a particular aircraft. You will need some idea of a destination however. America, Asia, Australia.....
2007-01-18 13:41:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by cherub 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
US Airways runs a Boeing 747 for flights from Johnstown, Pennsylvania to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
2007-01-15 03:26:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by MaryCheneysAccessory 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The 747 is nicely able to flying with engines operating in effortless words on one facet. in reality it may fly on one engine on condition that push contains shove. Many pilots were interior the uncomfortable position to ought to administration such an incident, yet not in effortless words on a 747. that is precision artwork for the flight crew; they ought to change the trim, artwork with rudder, flaps, elevators, ailerons, regardless of they offer theory to as functional interior the condition. There has once been an incident at the same time as a BA 747 (the city of Edinburgh) suffered a flame-out of all 4 engines via blockage by technique of volcanic ash over Indonesia. They were actually gliding yet managed to rekindle the engines. notwithstanding, they again suffered a second flame-out yet recovered again engines nos. 4 and three. on the on the spot, they did not even recognize what led to the flame-out. interior the right, they effectively landed in Jakarta after searching the glideslope for ILS replaced into inoperative and subsequently having to fly the localizer with the F/O monitoring the DME. they did not make it to the airfield yet had to be towed in by technique of a tug. To get again on your question: sure it may. notwithstanding, the most mandatory moments are the seconds between VR and V2 at take-off. V2 is threat-free to climb out. it truly is a pilot's nightmare to go back across an engine failure or having to close down one in those seconds once you're a very loaded 747. With the different plane, you are able to take-off with double thrust because of the burden notwithstanding that is puzzling to shove 450 plenty into the sky consisting of your engines already at max thrust. The 747 is between the suitable airplanes and ought to bear plenty if required and operated quite.
2016-11-24 19:07:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you have a 747 fetish?
2007-01-15 05:20:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
heathrow to gatwick
2007-01-15 03:22:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Snot Me 6
·
2⤊
0⤋