Near his ultimate Nirvana, the Buddha reversed his earlier teachings regarding eating meat, and so forth, and expounded the vegan doctrine of not taking anything that comes from animals, including leather, honey, milk, etc, because of the danger of "creating conditions with living things".....He also mentioned the danger of eating seeds, or fruits with seeds in them, as they, too, contained life.
What do you think could have possibly happened to change his attitude from "preferred vegetarianism" to "strictly vegan" and then some??
He even went so far as to state that those who would take from animals after his death (without him being there to make these things pure for them) will not reach Nirvana.
2007-01-04
15:58:35
·
5 answers
·
asked by
glassnegman
5
in
Food & Drink
➔ Vegetarian & Vegan
I never thought that there would be those who doubted my words, but since that is the case, the source is the Shurangama Sutra, and this is the quote I speak of, from the words of the Buddha himself:
" After my extinction, how can those who eat the flesh of beings be called the disciples of Shakya?
"You should know that these people who eat meat may gain some awareness and may seem to be in samádhi, but they are all great rakshasas. When their retribution ends, they are bound to sink into the bitter sea of birth and death. They are not disciples of the Buddha. Such people as these kill and eat one another in a never-ending cycle. How can such people transcend the Triple Realm?
"When you teach people of the world to cultivate samádhi, they must also cut off killing. This is the second clear and decisive instruction on purity given by the Thus Come Ones, the Buddhas of the Past, World Honored Ones.
"Therefore, Ánanda, if cultivators of chan samádhi do not cut off killing, they are like
2007-01-05
04:11:00 ·
update #1
one who stops up his ears and calls out in a loud voice, thinking that no one hears him.. He tries to cover up the sound, but only makes it greater.
"Pure Bhikshus and Bodhisattvas who practice purity will not even step on grass in the pathway; even less would they pull it up with their hands. How could anyone with great compassion consume the flesh and blood of beings?
"Bhikshus who do not wear silk, leather boots, furs, or down, whether imported or found locally, and who do not consume milk, cream, or butter, can truly transcend this world. When they have paid back their past debts, they will not have to re-enter the Triple Realm.
"Why not? When someone wears anything taken from a living creature, he creates conditions with the creature, just as when people ate the hundred grains, their feet could not leave the earth. Both physically and mentally one must avoid the bodies and the by-products of beings, by neither wearing them nor eating them. I say that such people have true
2007-01-05
04:13:24 ·
update #2
liberation.
"What I have said here is the Buddhas’ teaching. Any explanation counter to it is the teaching of Papiyan.
Insulting people with my ignorance is not a tactic I usually resort to, I'm happy to say.
And yes, while the Buddha may have accepted offerings of meat as his "last meal", he also spoke in the Great Paranirvana Sutra that one should wholly give up the eating of meat at that time. Will you take my word for that one, or must I find you the quote as well?
2007-01-05
04:19:33 ·
update #3