English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

The 144 cid and 170 cid and 200 cid have the same block, everything should fit. There is no 140 cid in 66 falcon

2006-12-31 10:11:20 · answer #1 · answered by kayef57 5 · 0 0

Um yeah. The real question is WHY do you want to ruin a perfectly good AMERICAN hot rod? As far as finding one well you will probably have to do buy a Toyo motor and do some major mods to it. For example the motor mounts my not line up right with the from, or the tranny my not fight properly which can cause several problems. Instead of spending all the money on all that, why not, just buy 572 c.i. with 500+ h.p. for around 10 grand, and be able to smoke any ricer that comes your way (don't be a fool and race it on the streets). I have 1965 Chevelle that has one and let me tell you it is one heck of feeling getting tossed back in the seat when you mash the gas. If you keep it all GM/Chevy you will get more on resell. I am not saying you have a bad idea. I myself have restored several cars including Camaros. and I am always looking for unique, never been done ideas. I respect the fact that you want to do something different, and encourage you to do so. There several others ways to make your car unique. I suggest going on google and searching for custom Camaros. You can do a lot with a welder and some sheet metal. Custom paint is Always an eye turner. Ghost flames are one of my favorites. Remember to take your time when doing any type custom work on your car. If rush into I can almost guarantee that you will have problems down the road. I have done this myself and literally had problems down the road.

2016-05-22 23:24:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes , the 140,170 and 250 use the same tranny/bolt pattern.

The 240 and 300 are truck motors and bolt up the same as a small block , I dont know for sure but if the 300 has the same bolt pattern as a 302/351w then I would assume that a 140/170/250 will not have the same bolt pattern as a small block.

2006-12-31 02:06:31 · answer #3 · answered by 1diputs 4 · 0 0

If you are in Australia, the 1966 used a borg warner 35 box and the c4 was used on the v8 289. some earlier models also only had a 2 speed auto. The bell housing where all the same.

2006-12-31 00:05:33 · answer #4 · answered by rod_fro 2 · 0 0

Yes, they both used a C-4 transmission. Most 6 cylinder and small V-8 engines used the C-4, and the larger engine vehicles used the C-6.
Glad I could help you. Good Luck!!!

2006-12-30 23:51:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the 140 ci wasn't offered until the Mustang came out in 74 as a 4 cyl 2.3 L. Maybe you are referring to the early Falcon 144 ci six :(

2006-12-31 09:11:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it depends on the option package on the car but for the most part yes. mihgt be a cruis o matic or a c-6

2006-12-31 03:05:16 · answer #7 · answered by Mike M 1 · 0 0

if your refub to orignal c-4. but if modifing it why settle with those motor and trans configurations. had a friend mod one with a 351C and a built c-6 it rocked

2006-12-31 05:01:15 · answer #8 · answered by ben e 3 · 0 0

yes they do.c4 transmission

2006-12-30 23:47:59 · answer #9 · answered by Mary O 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers