English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now, honestly. Is it really better for a child to be shuffled from foster home to foster home, and maybe be abused and unloved then to be raised by two loving parents who just happen to be the same sex? If christians don't want gays adopting, then what do they suggest should happen to all those unwanted and orphaned children? They won't just go away.

2006-12-30 20:19:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Please don't bash christians here. it isn't nice.

And no, homosexuality dosen't equal child molestation. Thats just silly. And there are no laws right now about who gets the child if a heterosexual couple breaks up- what is the difference?
Studies actually show that homosexual couples, when in a devoted relationship, are MORE likely to stay together then hetero couples because of the stigma agianst them. I don't have a source for that outside my sociology class, sorry.

2006-12-30 20:48:17 · update #1

11 answers

Wonderful question. I am not Christian, which probably has a lot to do with the way I will answer this. If a child can be offered a loving, caring home, who cares who gives it to them. It is much better to have a child living in a home with homosexual parents, than in no home at all. There are not enough homes as it is, so why would we deny anyone with the means to take in a child that opportunity?

Edit:

Link for those of you who believe homosexuality = child molestation (more to come)
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

This one is even better:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_chil.htm

Of course, these are just pulled out of thin air, but the second one is a religious tolerance site. It really does have interesting information.

"One study involved 175 male adults who had been convicted in Massachusetts of child sexual assault. They found that none of them were homosexuals; all of them would fit the description of a fixated child molester. They were sexually attracted only to children and not to other adults. 2 Another researcher studied sexually abused children seen in a hospital. Only 2 perpetrators (less than 1% of the total) were homosexuals (i.e. were attracted to same-sex adults)." ---- from the second site.

2006-12-30 20:24:41 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda D 3 · 1 0

One fails to see the comparison of apples and oranges, especially are not all humans, humans ? To equate the values of “two loving parents who just happen to be the same sex” with a criminal is to dehumanize the human condition, and for that matter, petty crimes.

The more pressing question is that of unchartered territory on the effect of such marital arrangements on the child: the issues being part of a minority and the stigmatism attached.

Needless to say, Love is rarely for self but for the other: a child is neither a trophy to represent a mile stone reached in life, nor to satisfy the natural or adopted parent’s desires: should parents have difficulty in defending their position, are they more or less able defend that of their child’s ?

One may only chose the best course of action at the time in all readiness and live with the outcome as responsible adults no matter the outcome.

As to religion, it is time tested with religious parties split into various factions as part of man's making, loosing the real message in translation. With unabated breath, this part of the answer requires the men that represent and lead their faith.

2006-12-31 00:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by pax veritas 4 · 0 0

There is enough misery and sadness in the world and abandoned children are a symptom of this.

Children dont asked to be born and if there is an opportunity for a child to be bought up in a loving home so be , hey i would even let single mums and dads adopt if they wanted.

Any love is good love.

The church had their time at raising children and usually these were done in places that were more like workcamps with the molesting thrown in for free.

I was schooled by Nuns and these were some of the most represed , viciuos and sadistic women you could ever meet..

The church is the last institution on earth that is fit to comment on who and how children should be bought up in my book.

2006-12-30 21:01:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I agree--homosexuals can make great parents. Statistically, most pedophiles are heterosexual, and the greatest violent threat to a child is an unstable stepfather. The heterosexual kind :-) Heterosexuals pose neither threat. About child-safety, see my source, below.

2006-12-31 00:00:38 · answer #4 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 0 0

This situation would be solved if there was more sexual responsibility. Since the age of free love, sex has become a source of entertainment, and not a source of love and affection between a married man and woman.

This may sound mean, but it is a fact... most pedophiles (forgive my spelling) are homosexual. This is a reason for caution. Not to mention, there are no legal restraints within a homosexual relationship. If they break up, who gets the kid?

2006-12-30 20:24:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Who cares what christians want or don't want for adoption. It's futile anyway to try to find logic in the reasoning of people suffering from schizoid delusional mental disorders.

Their idol , Jesus, was openly gay and enjoyed it. Homophobic christians should study a bit more their favorite middle eastern tales and legends.

2006-12-30 20:23:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I raised my little ones to be arranged for racists comments, provided that 2 of them are black and one a close-by Indian daughter. people who're racists, bigots, homophobic and in simple terms organic ignorant, are people who experience undesirable approximately themselves. they do unlike themselves, and intend to make themselves experience greater effective by utilising attempting to tear down somebody else. My little ones grew as much as appreciate that, simply by fact I arranged them for the racists etc. and that they regarded on them as unhappy, unhappy those that do greater injury to themselves than others. regrettably, training would not practice little ones approximately tolerance very lots, and consequently what's located out interior the homestead, usually keeps on with them for many of their lives. This project of racism., intolerance etc. is why i grow to be so ecstatic while Borack Obama one the election. a stable, sensible, psychological, astounding father and husband. An occasion of what any guy could be, if in simple terms they enjoyed fairly of hated.

2016-10-28 19:23:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They dont offer much in the way of unwanted pregnancy prevention such as sex ed or birth control or the morning after pill or abortion either.

2006-12-30 20:21:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The main problem is that they want to put scatter cushions in church!

2006-12-30 20:25:29 · answer #9 · answered by anthonypaullloyd 5 · 0 1

YES
Even the Jesus was gay

2006-12-30 20:23:27 · answer #10 · answered by The atheist revolutionary 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers