BEING NO.1 IN THE WORLD IS NOT PROBLEM. BUT KILLING THE PEOPLE FOR EXPANDING THE BUSINESS AND FORCING ITS POLICY ON THE OTHER COUNTRY IS NOT GENUINE. THEY MUST CONTROL THEMSELVES. OTHERWISE IT WILL TAKE THE WORLD TO THIRD WORLD WAR.
2006-12-30 20:08:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Not sure what your asking? But I actually could care less about IRAQ's people. We should not be over there anymore, we helped you get your dictator out that is more than we were required to do. Let Saddam kill innocent IRAQ people. They can stand up and fight him and be killed by him. Oh that is why the IRAQ people put him to death I forgot after we helped find him.
We should now move on to help end the killing in Darfu and then get out as soon as possible. Yes America should help when people are being exterminated, I am proud that we help other countries. I am not proud of this war or bush, I am proud we helped get a evil dictator out of power and let his country decide what to do with him. But I do not feel it is our job to rebuild the country for them.
Fu*k Bush but I applaud our country helping the little guy. I am proud to be an American but my President embarrasses me.
2006-12-31 04:11:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kdude 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
My guess is that the americans perpetrating (not the soldiers, think the higher ups) the violence in (assumably) your country are fed up with countries taking aid from the US at one moment and striking the US or aiding a strike against the US the next moment. There is no limit when dealing with safety in the USA, or even the security of our interests, even when those don't coincide with our direct safety.
2006-12-31 13:57:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by IRWEASEL 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Due to your incredibly vague question, I can only guess at my answer. But when I am president I will call for the invasion of your country over this question. I have a good memory. And when your family is pissed that the Americans are kicking your a.s.s. tell them with pride it is all your fault and watch your wife castrate you.
2006-12-31 09:25:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by militaryboy211 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is a limit, there shouldn't be. That's what being an American is about!
2006-12-31 04:18:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by jh 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
u r right.
if america can execute saddam for killing "148" people,thn america has killed much much more than that.thn bush should also b executed
thy r th only country 2 hav used a nuclear bomb n killed millions of japanese in th 2 world war.an incident which still affecing children born even now.coz people their had radiation from th bomb.
thy killed millions in vietnam.no american president has accounted 4 tht.
nobody knows howmany r killed durin th invasion in iraq n afghanistan.
2006-12-31 04:49:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Alien 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have no idea what you are talking about, but I think you would see more good coming from Americans in Iraq if they didn't have to fight off terrorists every time theyt turned around.
2006-12-31 04:05:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by man_of_mustard 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Should we have let Saddam continue to kill innocent people? I know that you will probably say that Americans do the same thing... but I would have to disagree. I think people in Iraq were born and raised into a dictatorship and they don't know how to think on their own. They are brainwashed. They should have HELPED THEMSELVES... but they didn't.
I think people like you are just looking for a reason to hate because you have too many pent up emotions and you need to find a more healthy outlet. It's okay to be angry about stuff other than your political crap, ya know? Maybe you should pray more about why you feel the need to obsess about America and what we're doing.
2006-12-31 03:58:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Latin_Lvr 1
·
4⤊
4⤋
Actually Bush invaded Iraq bcoz of its oil resources not bcoz of any WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction).Now he is running after Iran and N.Korea.
2006-12-31 04:46:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vivek 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dude, get a grip. Democrates, Republicans..... Whats the difference
2006-12-31 04:15:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a ground no man really wants to tread. It will be a political issue for a long time.
you need to clarify your question instead of a statement.
2006-12-31 04:03:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by miss bean 3
·
0⤊
2⤋