English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He was hung cause he killed under 200 people, how many people children and inocent die to get him hung ! So why is Bush still walking

2006-12-30 17:48:01 · 12 answers · asked by scratch_n_sniff 3 in Politics & Government Military

12 answers

Bush should hang too, along with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Blair and Straw.
They're all traitors, usurpers and murders and should suffer the same fate.

2006-12-30 20:37:11 · answer #1 · answered by Ministry of Camp Revivalism 4 · 0 3

I am sure your application for micky mouse membership will not be approved again this itme around. Realy you have to get an education of some kind.
It's like he was only tried for 147 sheitii deaths, but in order to save money and get his death over with they delayed the other million o rso he killed.
SDo far no corpuses have turned up with bush's dna on them.
Do you have a bush fetish or soemthing., do you dream of him or what. Do you need ot see a doctor, get meds. YOu have stay on your meds .

2006-12-31 01:56:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

America is an all volunteer armed forces, and I support them completely you d.a.m.n.e.d. terrorist. And Saddam killed those 200 people over a failed assasination attempt that they were not involved in, but they lived in that town. And If you look at the children and innocents dying, the vast majority are killed by IRAQI insurgents, not US troops d.u.m.b.a.s.s.

2006-12-31 09:40:08 · answer #3 · answered by militaryboy211 2 · 1 0

He was convicted to die for 147 Kurds. Why spend more time on a trial for a man already convicted and sentenced to die.

What, you really think he killed less than 200 people? What planet are you from?

2006-12-31 01:50:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

He was only charged with one offence among many.
He was hanged before he could answer any of the other accusations of mass murder because this would have meant introducing evidence implicating the US and other western countries in their support for Saddam at the time of these killings.

2006-12-31 01:54:24 · answer #5 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1 1

cause bush didnt kill people. were in a thing called a war. i really wish liberals would open a book, or at least turn on the tv once in a while, and lay off the michael moore website.

and do you have any idea how America goes to war? didnt think so! Congress and US inteligence say we need to go to war, the President signs off on it, and at any rate, im overjoyed that saddam is dead, and i think 85%of the world is too.

2006-12-31 01:53:06 · answer #6 · answered by kevin l 1 · 5 1

Saddam was on the wrong side. Tojoj and few other Japanese were found guilty and hanged as war criminals after WWII. If Japan had won, they might have been heroes.

2006-12-31 01:58:42 · answer #7 · answered by Max 6 · 1 1

Why don't you go where Saddam is and ask him. I am betting he can tell you the difference. BTW, take some water with you when you go.

2006-12-31 01:50:43 · answer #8 · answered by k3s793 4 · 4 0

It adds up here. You got your head stuck up a rotten pumpkin.

2006-12-31 01:56:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Are you serious? yikes - you may need to pack your bags and more to Iraq or Russia with that attitude.

2006-12-31 01:51:23 · answer #10 · answered by Jared L 4 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers