English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-30 16:37:17 · 6 answers · asked by tamarack649 2 in Sports Martial Arts

6 answers

Liddell in the third. YAAAY!!!
He had Ortiz beatin into a pulp in the first, but was saved by the bell
Then Ortiz (sort of) came back in the second, only because of a last minute takedown, but otherwise he did NOTHING!

Then they had an exchange in the third that Liddell got the better of and Ortiz was left blocking his head and not adequately defending himself, so the fight was called (very justifiably!) as a TKO for Liddell!

2006-12-30 16:46:27 · answer #1 · answered by Jawa 3 · 0 0

Liddell will beat him. He hasn't lost in like 3 years, he has ideas-blowing takedown risk-free practices, he's the quickest striker i've got have been given ever considered in my existence (in MMA), and he has finess/staying potential. What else do you like. He has the suitable weight and precise for it and that i do now no longer see him dropping for atleast yet yet another 3 years (if he does not get injured alongside the way). on an identical time as evaluating the two, do now no longer raise Chuck Liddell fights that occurred 3 years interior the previous. That grew to alter into suitable right into a protracted time interior the previous and he's alot extra suitable useful at modern-day than he grew to alter into into on an identical time as he went against that Rampage guy. Plus there is no way that the thumb grew to alter into into intentional. If he could be that precise including his punch (to be waiting to thumb him) then i do now no longer see why he might might desire to play airborne airborne dirt and airborne dirt and dirt and airborne dirt and airborne dirt and dirt; he might desire to surely knock him out particularly. And what does Tito have? He has 3 wins against a 40 2 365 days previous, comprehensive out, senior citizen who might desire to've been out of the sport like 7 years interior the previous. in case you place Tito Ortiz against Couture, he might definately lose. evaluate Tito's very final 5 warring events to Chucks and tell who had it extra suitable useful. On December thirtieth it relatively is gonna be Chuck Liddell's win, hands down. BTW, if Tito Ortiz wasn't such and smug hothead i does not be so against him yet i'm no longer able to be able to stand loud mouths, relatively on an identical time as they are not the suitable.

2016-11-25 02:10:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't know what the hype was about. Neither are they heavyweight, nor was it a new match. Ortiz lost already so the same outcome was likely, unless the first match was close, which it wasn't.

2006-12-30 16:46:05 · answer #3 · answered by perfectlybaked 7 · 0 0

Chuck beat the crap out of F a g Tito.

2006-12-30 16:40:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

enough already. when you ask this question, other questions of the same come up. why dont you all look at the ones that exist already instead of spamming the board?

2006-12-30 18:13:33 · answer #5 · answered by SAINT G 5 · 1 0

liddell

2006-12-30 16:38:59 · answer #6 · answered by SST 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers