considering we are the only country to have used an n-bomb on civilians we shouldn't interfere with others.they might need them to deter violence also.
2006-12-30 15:34:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by brian l 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
we are the only ones allowed to have nuclear weapons. and we are the only country allowed to say which other country can have nuclear weapons. in 1996 we were 30 seconds aways from launching and destroying Russia. the launch codes were entered and the automatic count down had been started. it was aborted after concerns of a missle was just a small plane.
unstable regeims or incompentent governemnts; what's the difference.
2006-12-30 15:28:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
first its not fair for a country to declare a war against other country because they have NWMD, while this country (who is declaring the war) is making the same weapon, unless this country have a plan and will get something out of the war. however i think that the three men you mentioned are all wise men and will do the right thing (but I'm telling you they will be fair)
2006-12-30 15:38:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by hamsa 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
If I were the leader of a country like North Korea or Iran, I would tell the USA to get rid of its nuclear weapons and to stop meddling in others' affairs.
If the US can have nuclear weapons, in fact, the most nuclear weapons of any country, then it cannot reasonably tell other countries that they can't have them.
2006-12-30 15:32:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by homo erectus 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
the super cheer leaders for the Iraq conflict interior the U. S. have been George, Dick, Condi and a reluctant Colin. Any tries to pretend otherwise is juvenile a minimum of. you will locate that interior the keenness of the era placed up Sept 11 each American and various others around to international which consists of uk's PM Tony Blair and Australia's PM John Howard and their diverse Ministers have been falling over themselves to help and legitimise the folly of an attack on Iraq. If in certainty you arent in simple terms being cheating you are able to desire to coach your self by utilising gaining knowledge of the numerous tries to legitimise the assumption of "pre-emptive attack".
2016-10-28 18:58:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by lobos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I will not endanger my family and friends. Not everyone is called to martyrdom. You may accept this gift, but it is not mine to oppose upon my children.
I believe in the United States of America. I believe we are a free people who has never conquered an enemy. We have always established peace with our enemies, rebuilt their land, and offered freedom to their people.
Peace through Strength. Amen.
2006-12-30 15:39:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lives7 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is a big difference between having those weapons and being barberrick and evil enough to actually use them.
2006-12-30 15:37:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am an atheist but I believe If these countries are a threat to us, yes. We have a right to defend ourselves at all costs.
2006-12-30 15:27:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The N-bomb?
2006-12-30 15:24:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by STFU Dude 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is about looking out for what is best for ourselves and our friends. It isn't, and has never been about being "fair."
2006-12-30 15:25:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Alex 6
·
2⤊
1⤋