Below is a link to a U.S.C.I.S. immigration form. CHANGE ADDRESS. What part of the form do you disagree with?

Question

http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/ar-11.pdf

The above is a form issued by the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to ALL aliens present. The alien must register any of the following changes: (1) address, (2) employment, (3) school.

ALL aliens, including children, are required to submit the form to DHS within ten (10) days of the change. Written upon the form is a warning that the alien who fails to comply is subject to deportation.
THIS FORM DHS almost always ignored. DHS does not even maintain an accurate database for legal and illegal aliens. DHS never even asks an immigrant if he has always complied with the AR-11 requirement. The applicant's information is almost NEVER cross-checked with the DHS database. (exceptions apply). DHS officials actually have a list of prior addresses on form G-325, Biography, submitted with AN application. Why do you believe DHS is so slacK AND ignores these laws? Can DHS change? Will Congress act?

Answer 1

Sorry, but I can't figure out how you can disagree with a FORM!

Answer 2

No, i think of it is extra alongside the line of sharecroppers. After the Civil conflict the freed slaves that stayed interior the South have been taken benefit of with the aid of plantation vendors. They knew the freed slaves have been damaging and desperately mandatory artwork and money. so as that they've been employed as sharecroppers on those plantations. they might generally survive or close to the plantations/farms. they might then artwork on those farms which gave them seem after and little or no money. The sharecroppers might borrow money from the plantation vendors for the crop seed and for kit. they might plant, tend, and %. all the vegetation on the plantation(merely like the slaves) yet on the tip of the crop season they might ought to pay back the plantation vendors and shop what money that they had left. in spite of the undeniable fact that, for the time of a foul crop season, the sharecroppers could no longer pay back the money and can be in debt to the plantation proprietor. this could be a non-quit cycle because it became confusing for the families to artwork off the debt and pay back the money from the present season. they might generally fall right into a hollow of debt that became impossible to dig out of. The families could no longer bypass away until they paid all debts. They have been manipulated with the aid of the plantation proprietor. So now he have been given loose artwork that became technically legal as they have been paid......they might merely ought to pay it back to the plantation proprietor to pay off some debt. i comprehend i rambeled slightly, yet back to the unique element. The unlawful immigrants are being manipulated with the aid of the human beings who employed them. it relatively is affordable artwork, and the employees can artwork long hours for little pay. Now are not getting me incorrect, unlawful immigrants scouse borrow jobs from human beings. My stepdad lost many job possibilities to unlawful immigrants. yet that still does not make it suitable. it is not slavery because of the fact they are being manipulated no longer compelled to artwork. The slaves have been compelled to artwork.

Answer 3

do you think they are all honest enough to fill this out? i don't think they all have filled it out.

Answer 4

i cant really answer that sorry