i thought the plenty for murder was beheading in Islam?

Question

i could be wrong. but i thought it was and if it was why was Saddam hung?

Answer 1

You are right according to shariah(islamic code of law) its beheading but you must keep in mind that this penality was conceived at the time when this practice was followed by all the cultures, civilizations and regimes of that particular time period.The Roman Empire beheaded citizens (such as the Christian Saint Paul) while they crucified noncitizens (such as Jesus Christ). French revolutionaries employed the guillotine to decapitate opponents. Nevertheless, Islam is the only major world religion today that is cited by both state and non-state actors to legitimize beheadings. Charles I was beheaded with an axe: Such a death was considered nobler and more dignified than mere hanging, a form of execution unbecoming for the upper classes. Beheading remained the prerogative of the well-born in Europe until Dr. Guillotin, in the name of humanity, proposed his democratic beheading machine after the Convention decreed in 1792 that all executions henceforth should be by decapitation; the machine swiftly proved popular with the crowds and was last used in public in France in 1939.Beheading was only suggested by islam since it gives the least pain to a person unlike other forms of death penality in those times.

Answer 2

ok, what seems from the object to have got here approximately is that Pakistani militants abducted a Polish guy and then made demands to the Pakistani government for the launch of Taliban prisoners. The Pakistani government did no longer adjust to the demands , and so the abductors killed the Polish guy as they had threatened to do, asserting on a video that they blamed Pakistan for no longer agreeing to their demands. I see no reference through the abductors to Islam or any asserting of the Prophet Muhammad. it type of feels to me a hostage difficulty like hundreds till now it. Kidnappers take somebody, make demands, then kill or launch the hostage. Beheading a guy is a very gruesome thank you to kill, and that i think they chosen that way intentionally to get the main interest to their reason. in the event that they had shot him, it may well be despicable of direction, even regardless of the indisputable fact that it might infrequently make the information outdoors Pakistan. this manner, they are certain worldwide huge effect. of direction there is not any longer something in Islam to condone what they did. The lifeless guy replaced into an harmless sufferer. even regardless of the indisputable fact that it is not approximately Islam. it particularly is approximately politics and manipulating the media for a reason. it particularly is as cynical as that. yet that regrettably is the worldwide we are residing in at present.

Answer 3

Actually you are right, I never understood why they chose to do so
A lot of Muslims do not go by the Sharia, Islamic laws...
So it's quiet normal to find such doings.

Answer 4

Islam is not a country. Laws and penalties differ everywhere.

Answer 5

Its too hard to scrap up the remains and ship them back to Tikrit.

Answer 6

plenty?