The actions of corporations ought to be held to the same moral standards as the actions of individuals?

Question

So this is the new LD topic for debate. I really need some evidence. Links, cards, that sort of thing. arguments would be nice too. Thnx guys ud be life savers.

Answer 1

Most certainly. Because a corporation is nothing more than a collection of individuals, and they should be held to the same moral standard whether or not they're grouping their assets together. I mean, if it's wrong for one individual to do something, then it's also wrong for twenty individuals to do it. Morality can't be discarded merely because the individuals choose to use a formal arrangement with one another. Corporations are a legal structure, not a moral one; and a corporate structure is no excuse for immorality.

I just made this stuff up, but you can quote me if you like.

Answer 2

Hey, I happen to be on the same topic. One great quick thing for you to maybe use, or take into mind, aside from the evidence debate, is maybe some good old fashioned logic. There are always loopholes in the resolutions for LD, and one big one here, that you can maybe use on the affirmative, or negative, both, is that the moral standards of individuals arent always that great. Some individuals are very moral, some arent. Some corporations are very moral. Some arent. So, it works out.
I dunno, I've always written my cases with little to no evidence much at all. Sometimes its a risky thing to do, because different judges like different things, but If you get one that is more traditional to the original idea of LD, philosophy, sometimes good logic is what turns the tables.

Answer 3

I have very little respect for people who try to write their debate cases by taking opinions from ignorant people on Yahoo Answers, but I'll help you out all the same. <--Intentional irony

Aff: in order to determine the morality of an action, we look at the action, the situation and its consequences. Nowhere in that list is the word "actor". We are determining whether or not the actual actions should be held to the same moral standards, not the actors, and since all actions should be held to the same moral standards, the actor is irrelevant. Therefore: I affirm.

Neg: The entire reason for a corporation to exist is to make money. If a corporation is not held to a lower standard than individuals, it cannot make sufficient money, thus obliterating its reason for existence, and causing harm to the economy. Therefore, I negate.

Answer 4

I thoroughly agree that corporations must be held to a similar moral criteria as persons. shall we take the corporate verify as an celebration. Say I wrote a verify to a seller, signed it and extra it in replace for products. shouldn't that money be accessible contained in the commercial company on the time the verify change into extra? after all I did receive products for my checking draft. someone who warning signs the corporate verify many of the time and in maximum STATES, can't be held criminally responsible for the verify of it comes lower back as inadequate money. the seller that received the undesirable verify is out of things and amenities, good? Why shouldn't they be entitled to amassing on the verify as they could with a human being? after all the seller did receive a fraudulent verify. it truly is merely one celebration and that i have many many extra. Take Care