I wouldn't even try--it's ridiculous. I wish our country (speaking as an American) would go back to "We have nothing to fear but fear itself" and move away from the, "The TERRORISTS are COMING for YOUR FAMILY!!!"
2006-12-30 11:42:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is the world we live in today unfortunately.I do not like it either but our system of checks and balances will not allow this country to become a police state.I am not saying it is a good thing but it is a necessary evil right now.I am and always will be anti government intrusion into our lives but if the alternative is terrorists repeating 9/11 or worse,I think I can deal with some of the inconveniences.
2006-12-30 17:55:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr Bellows 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Most people fall for the myth that security is attainable. The reality is the world is chaos with a thin veneer of order.
2006-12-30 17:52:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dane 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
IT'S NOT. BUT IT IS PART OF THE BOTTOM FRAMEWORK OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER WHICH USHERS IN THE TRIBULATIONS OR THE LAST 7 YEARS OF EARTH AS WE KNOW IT. PROPOSED BY GFEORGE SOROS, THE ILLUMINATI AND OF COURSE THE DECEITFUL BUSH FAMILY.
Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you.
Matthew 6:33
GOD BLESS
2006-12-30 17:55:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by thewindowman 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
i love canada. i really hope that the people here don't ever hail to a leader that makes us live in a freedomless fear. i guess thats what freedom fries are for. just eat the fries and forget that you have no rights and you will be too fat and lazy to care that the president is chosing to shut down the country.
2006-12-30 17:55:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Benjamin Franklin said that a people who are willing to give up their liberties for more security deserve neither and will lose both.
2006-12-30 17:51:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Darwin d00d 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
I don't! Liberty is worth dying for.
2006-12-30 17:52:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by shirleykins 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's infantile, isn't it?
2006-12-30 17:52:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I can't.
2006-12-30 18:08:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋