2006-12-30 06:43:17 · 10 answers · asked by Thomas M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Right at first ...No. It will eventually help in reducing the insurgency to a degree. If you remember at the close of WW2 in Germany, The German people were somewhat relieved at the demise of Adolf Hitler when he committed suicide. Adolf knew he would have faced the same fate that eventually saddam faced. The majority of the German people feared Adolf Hitler as the Iraqis feared Saddam. Now that Saddam is dead, the Iraqi people can breath a sigh of relief knowing that they will never again have to face the tyranny from Saddam or his regime ever again. That is a huge victory in the war against terror as was the death of Al Zacarwe. The war on terror is going to be a slow process as was WW2. There are those who say that this is WW3...could be....but this fight is a global fight, its not just in Iraq or Afghanistan, its in Africa, the US, the UK and in hundreds of other countries around the world. It just comes in a different wrapper where its located.
2006-12-30 06:59:31 · answer #1 · answered by SOSFG 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must be kidding....right? Iraq has been fighting itself and every neighboring country, off and on, for the past 5000 years.
Hanging Saddam will not make a difference in the war anymore than our (USA) presence there will. If the Garden of Eden was located in Iraq as many believe, the very first act of violence, when Cain killed Abel, occurred there and has not stopped since.
2006-12-30 06:50:32 · answer #2 · answered by one eye 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The enemy of my enemy is my pal. seem on the time line. JAN seventy 9...Shah of Iran over thrown, JUL seventy 9....Saddam takes potential in Iraq. Nov seventy 9....Hostages taken in Iran. Dec seventy 9..u.s. invades Afghanistan. summer season 1980 Iraq assaults Iran. the u . s . a . helped Iraq as a ability of having back at Iran. yet we actually did no longer desire Iraq to win the two so we secretly helped Iran. (have self assurance it or no longer, Israel helped Iran additionally.) with the aid of helping the two factors, the conflict dragged on for 8 years and neither had the flexibility to reason issues someplace else.. as quickly as the conflict ended, they started meddling in different international locations. What we would desire to continually have completed is supply all and sundry a nuke and the flexibility to furnish it to the capital city of the different. think of what number issues that would have solved.
2016-11-25 01:09:03 · answer #3 · answered by cubias 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it wasn't meant to. It was a gift the justice system of Iraq gave to the citizens of Iraq. Now the people of Iraq know that the butcher of Baghdad is truly gone forever with no chance of coming back.
2006-12-30 06:45:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No if anything it will make it worse in the short run because the Sunni's will be seeking revenge for his being hung by the mostly Shite government.
2006-12-30 06:52:25 · answer #5 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not at all but maybe it will ease the minds of some of his victims family.
2006-12-30 07:02:32 · answer #6 · answered by tankbuff, 19 violations so far 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this will worsen the situation.
2006-12-30 06:50:16 · answer #7 · answered by sahar el2amar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it will pump up the more radical side of islam, the shittes. yipee!
2006-12-30 06:59:01 · answer #8 · answered by Demon_Hunter 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2006-12-30 07:14:16 · answer #9 · answered by Starry Eyes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
same old, same old.
2006-12-30 06:58:10 · answer #10 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋