Several years ago I had a lot of compassion for the plight of the poor in all nations.I would do many humanitarian things thru the social clubs I belong to.We arranged for 5 semi trucks loaded with food,clothing and toys to go to the Mexican state of Chihuahua.We had to pay bribes to every person of any authority
from the border all the way into the small town that was our destination. The people were over joyed with what we brought ,and then we had to bribe our way back to the border.
I'm not sure that the food and goods weren't taken from them as soon as we left.
But over the years as I educated myself more and more on Mexico and the illegal alien problem.I became more and more opposed to the actions of theses people.I believe in the law and to see our laws flaunted and disregarded really had an effect on me .When I begin to see the damage being done to my city and my country I became angry and wanted it stopped.Then the marchers of the May demonstrations really ended my compassion once and for all.Its not about race to me I don't want any illegal aliens from any country here .I have become more and more active in the issue.I joined the Minute Men here in AZ and I am doing everything legally possible to help in this cause.
I was never pro amnesty,nor would I ever be .But I once did feel sorry for them.I still do but I love my nation more than I care about them.
Thats very interesting on your blog sievocal I agree that America must wake up to the dangers of the Islam extremists of the world.Well done,thank you
2006-12-30 06:22:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
There have continually been double standards in professional-amnesty arguments on the immigration subject. i'm no longer in basic terms finding this out. everybody who thinks that calling all and sundry racist, on an identical time as stereotyping white human beings isn't a double favourite, does not comprehend the definition of "double favourite". professional-Anti-Amnesty? bypass away off the "professional". it is anti-amnesty, anti-unlawful alien, or anti-unlawful immigration. so a techniques as what little experience i will make from something of your question (it is written very incoherently), professional-amnesty human beings should not be stressful something. the government shouldn't address the demands of unlawful invaders, merely like the government does not address or meet the demands of terrorists.
2016-11-25 01:05:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOPE!! Breaking laws i do not feel should be condoned by any civil person in this country. If I want to go to mexico or any other country and break their laws, will I get amnesty? No Way!! I would be buried under their jail. so why should we do any different? We have enough law breakers here already and most of them are from south of the border so why give amnesty to those that would break our laws in the first place? Let them come in the lawful way or no way at all.
2006-12-30 06:06:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by ramall1to 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
I know the amnesty will not work how they say it will. This will not stop others from pouring in. I also do not like the idea of the illegal people in question arrogantly demanding citizenship, its like a child who demands a cookie. You will never feel inclined to reward a rotten little brat, the same goes for illegals who think the world owes them something just because they struggle. EVERYONE STRUGGLES.
2006-12-30 08:41:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sandra O 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Anti amnesty. Is the government going to give everyone the same opportunity to go that many years without paying taxes and then just forgive us. No they arent. Then unless they let everyone have a 5 year tax free period it isnt fair to us legal Americans. Besides they are crimminals.
2006-12-30 07:01:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Good question. Yes, at one small point I was. I have no objection to folks coming here for opportunity. I know the human aspects are such that sometimes you can't wait around. You gotta move on it. Come what may. Including tryin something illegal. The whole point of law and order is to keep people from doing that very thing. Law and order have gone out the window on this issue. On many other issues as well.
The USA probubly has had it. WE are on the way down. Hope I'm wrong but when law is gone, what's the point? You carry your own gun, make your own law and order?
a little bit of a bad thing is OK in the USA. WE are a big, notoriously agressive place. So in the beggining a bit was OK for me. NOW, things have changed. We are about to become a south/central AMerican country.
2006-12-30 06:34:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
If we give amnesty to the illegals than we should let all the criminals go free to and close all the jails down.
2006-12-30 07:59:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Never have been pro-amnesty. And it angers me that illegals and their supporters think they have the tight to protest and demand things while waving their nations flags in our faces. What part of the word illegal do people not understand?
2006-12-30 07:45:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by bebe 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am anti amnesty and always have been http://www.noamnesty.com/facts/why_not_amnesty.PDF
2006-12-30 06:10:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I have never been an advocate for Criminal Trespass into America. I will never become an advocate for any type of an amnesty for Criminal Trespassers within MY country. Nuff said.
2006-12-30 06:02:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by RENEGADE. 3
·
7⤊
2⤋