How different does it make things for a woman if a man has not been circumcised?

Question

I have heard there is a different sensation for the woman but what exactly is it like and which way is better?

Answer 1

The natural penis is designed by nature to maximize the sexual pleasure for the woman, as well as the man, during intercourse.

Conversely, circumcised sex is known to harm women in at least
10 ways: http://sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/1hook_scrapes.html

If a woman takes a few minutes to educate herself on how the two kinds of penises differ, she'll know what to look for, and be able to make her own a clear judgement on "...which way is better, circumcised sex or natural sex?" and not have to rely on the opinions of others.
---------------

Answer 2

Most women prefer a man with a circumcised penis because it may move inside them in a less friction-based manner. Once he is inside the vagina, the circumcised penis may easily slide up and down to create pleasure for both partners.

There are several advantages for circumcised men when it comes to sexuality. First is that circumcised male have no need to worry about daily cleansing of his foreskin. Meanwhile, men with an uncircumcised foreskin must take special care to move it up and down and clean it inside its covered areas to avoid odors or serious infection because of material buildup. Consequently, there might be some bacteria and germs that could surface thus affect their sexual health.

Safe sex is an added concern for uncircumcised men and their partners. Men with foreskins occasionally have difficulty finding the right condom or keeping one on during penetrative sexual activity. That spells trouble in bed as well as generates unneeded anxiety.

As for the sensitivity of the penis, no medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm

Several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up to seven times less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site:
http://www.torontodailynews.com/index.php/HealthNews/2006121404Circumcision

As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html

Circumcision is an easy and nowadays painless procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.

Answer 3

No difference at all. If you heard otherwise, it could just be a coincidence that a "different" time happened to be with an uncircumcised male. At the end of the day, it's not the tool itself, but the skill of the craftsman, that makes all the difference in the world. ;)

Answer 4

Men who are circumcised are more sensitive there so they last for less time than ones who aren't. There isn't much difference at all.

Answer 5

men who arent circumcised take longer because of that extra they have to pull the skin back and all that junk and then they have to go through extra mesure when they shower to make sure that they get it really clean because that is an std waiting to happen

Answer 6

there is no difference at all other than they last longer which makes it better for the woman cuzz u know a woman take longer than a man does to get there :o)

Answer 7

To be honest I didn't notice a difference as long as he takes care of business that all that matters

Answer 8

If there is ever any danger you can always climb up and hide inside the foreskin while he fights off the evil doers.

Answer 9

nothing is really different and you won't be able to tell at all.

Answer 10

read these.