Yes, and yes.
2006-12-30 02:35:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
not now he dont ,but there was a man who was known as this because he killed people who went against him and he impaled their heads on stakes around the castle where he lived ,he had a son called dracule ,and he was later called dracular this is where all the movies come from ,so although he do not excist for real now he once did ,i remember reading all about it many years ago but my memory isnt what it used to be but this is a wounderfull story of a man and his family ,its sad as well ,the didnt fly and things like that but they were known to drink the blood of their victums to add insult to them and all that might try to follow in the victums foot prints ,,they were a very feared family ,i cant remember what the book was called but it was to do with how the films about dracular started ,its a fasinating story if you can find the book i remember i couldnt put it down ,but that was a long time ago as i said i hope this has opened your eyes ,all the best kat
2006-12-30 10:44:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by whitecloud 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He exists only as a nick-name here, but Vlad I the Impaler really existed, he was a king in one of the regions of my country, but not a vampire. Hungarian Romanian-haters spread this rumor, but it's false. He did punish many criminals, though. ;)
2006-12-30 10:39:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cristina 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
'Vlad The Impaler' did exist.He was the son of Drac the Count of that area of Transylvania.He achieved this title mostly due to his form of warning off potential invaders.He had ,it is said,20,000 enemy invaders impaled on stakes and left as visual aids to anyone contemplating an attack on his domain.These 20,000 were placed all along the then southern border of Transylvania.Vlad The Impaler is also referred to as...DRACULA!Drac was his father u la means the son of.So,Dracula translates to 'The son of Drac'.
2006-12-30 10:51:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sweet Willy 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Vlad 3? You mean Darth Vader? Or Darth Maul?
2006-12-30 10:36:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
He exists, he`s hanging around here somewhere, but I am not a goldfish. I am barracuda.
2006-12-30 10:43:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Social Science Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He did at one TIME. Surely fantasy of Kate Beckinsale really being a vampire in her spare time is more worthy of contemplation? Yes?
2006-12-30 10:37:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He existed, he is dead now.
The cognitive ressources of goldfish do not allow them to use the Internet. I therefore do not believe that you are one.
Ramen !
2006-12-30 10:37:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It appears that you are a Goldfish.
2006-12-30 10:36:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♣ My Brainhurts ♣ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're a goldfish.
2006-12-30 10:35:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
your a goldfish hunni
2006-12-30 10:36:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋