Tyrant or whatever Saddam was a big fighter against empire builders
2006-12-30 01:56:38 · 12 answers · asked by The atheist revolutionary 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't think by any standards especially the Islamic one, he met the conditions to be a martyr in the first place.
But even him deserved a fair trial which was not granted and in this regards, he won against Bush and his warmonger associates.
God knows best.
Happy Eid al-Adha.
Peace and Love.
2006-12-30 02:51:36 · answer #1 · answered by mil's 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was not a victim of anything. You say Saddam fought against empire builders. You are wrong. Saddam was an empire builder who built his own dictatorial empire and tried to expand it through murdering his neighbors.
The United States has saved Iraq from a murderer, and is now working to help the Iraqi people build their own free country, just like we helped Germany and Japan after World War 2.
Saddam, like Tojo, deserved to be hanged, and now God will judge him...
2006-12-30 02:05:59 · answer #2 · answered by jesuscuresislam 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are ways to fight empire builders that do not have to include genocide and shedding of innocent blood. His trial may not have been 100% fair but at least he got one which is more than can be said about many of the people he ruthlessly and intentionally murdered. I am happy with the outcome and his subsequent sentence being carried out but I am more happy about the justice God will dole out to him upon judgement day. I imagine hanging will have been the least of saddams worries.
2006-12-30 02:03:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was a scapegoat used by the coalition as an excuse to justify a war that should never have happened. Karma is just-the bad people who instigated the carnage in Iraq will reap all that they have sown just like Saddam.
2006-12-30 02:02:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i do no longer see how that makes any experience. A martyr is somebody who sacrifices his or her existence for a reason. The sufferers of the attack are with the aid of definition sufferers, no longer martyrs. they did no longer p.c. to die for a reason, they have been on the incorrect place on the incorrect time. i'm happy that no longer all Muslims sympathize with Islamic suicide bomber martyrs. regrettably, I even have considered info that many different Muslims do manage those human beings as heroes of the religion.
2016-11-25 00:45:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither!
grace2u
2006-12-30 01:59:36 · answer #6 · answered by Theophilus 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, he was an empire builder himself.
2006-12-30 02:00:26 · answer #7 · answered by Deirdre H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Justice was served to Saddam. Now we need to serve justice to the ones who don't want peace.
2006-12-30 01:59:28 · answer #8 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. He got what he deserved. Someone has said that Iraq was better off under Sadam than at present. The same could said of Germany in 1945! "They were better off under Hitler than at present!"
2006-12-30 02:05:49 · answer #9 · answered by edward_lmb 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think your a victim of a poor English teacher
2006-12-30 02:03:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋