After reading the LA times on Sunday, there was one study of people who lives over to be or are over the age of 100 years.
Out of 400 people in the study, they were studied for life-styles, etc. Not a single vegetarian among the 400...not 1. Being one for roughly six months(and then I snapped watching someone eat a In-n-Out hamburger), I always felt a bit weak.
It may be a moral choice/issue not to eat meat/fish/poultry, but it appears in moderate amounts to be benefical long-term. The study would suggest we are designed by nature to eat meat as well as veggies.
2006-12-27
02:53:39
·
9 answers
·
asked by
LovePinkPuffies
3
in
Food & Drink
➔ Vegetarian & Vegan
Actually, the FDA approves drugs commonly precribed with less subjects than 400 people...
2006-12-27
07:20:03 ·
update #1
I think you need to look at a bigger picture here. How many people born in 1906 were ever vegetarians? It's probably a small number. It also doesn't say where these centenarians lived, but overall, many do seem to come from Asian cultures, which historically have ate less meat than western society.
I googled the article, and it speaks a lot about some genetic changes in certain people that allow them to live longer, in some ways regardless of certain lifestyle choices. There's no way to say that they would have lived shorter or longer lives if they had cut out the meat.
I think that your last sentence is certainly a huge leap, one that you were drawn to because it's what you want to believe. That's what we all do in life, find the facts that support our beliefs and hold on to those. But applying my slightly trained scientific eye to it, I don't think that you've made your case at all.
2006-12-27 13:44:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by lizettadf 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to say, that does show something, although I think some people would rather it didn't. With 4.5% of people vegetarians in the US it would seem unlikely, were vegetarianism all it was cracked up to be.
@ Matt H
1. Albeit only one study, that doesn't mean the information is worthless.
2. That's not that far under 1% of the total number of centenarians in the US, so while it may be 'only' 400 people, it's a significantly larger proportion than most studies done relating to the general public. Secondly, the number of vegetarians in the population is about 4.5% IIRC, so you'd expect about 18 in the group, more so if you believe that vegetarians are healthier on average than the average of the general public. Of course the error margin could be reasonably large in a study of this small scale, but I think most people would think it unlikely that there were none, the error margin is unlikely to be that large.
3. Someone who lives to 100 is quite likely to be healthy at 80 and 90. And if you don't want to suffer a poor quality of life there's always assisted suicide (I joke).
4. I haven't read that book (I doubt you're surprised) but I can't find any other information on this topic (centenarians specifically) on the web, neither for nor against. There were however a few sites which suggested (although no data or proof shown) that vegetarianism doesn't increase likelihood of living for a hundred years.
@ Totnesmartin, the problem with the classic vegetarians live longer statistics is that they aren't very reliable. Yes, veggies are more likely to live longer, but their not eating meat isn't the only variable: veggies are less likely to smoke, eat junk food, binge drink and generally take more care of their diet and health; this makes it very hard to show the relationship meat has on longevity. No study as yet has managed to properly eliminate all the variables, but the ones that have taken this into account have shown little difference between meat eaters and vegetarians.
Also don't forget vegetarians are mostly women, who have a life expectancy which is quite a few years longer than men anyway.
It also depends how the data is measured; if done by death rate veggies get the upper hand as they are, on average, younger, and thus will have a lower death rate than the average of the rest of the pop. regardless of diet.
These things can all easily be countered to make data reliable, but many studies saying veggies live longer ignore at least one of these things, making them flawed and worthless, not that that'll bother some people.
2006-12-27 11:06:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by AndyB 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is funny that people think a subject group of 400, representing people 100 years old or older is small.
C'mon, people just need to figure this out for themselves. Listen to your own body and stop judging what other people do with theirs.
Additionally, people who in this day and age have lived that long know that you can't be so choosy all of the time about the things that you eat as long as they sustain your life.
2006-12-27 07:52:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by chef.jnstwrt 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are 18 distinctive animal shapes interior the Animal Crackers cookie zoo Your physique is arising and killing 15 million pink blood cells consistent with secondThe king of hearts is the only king and not utilizing a mustache on a conventional enjoying card There are no longer any clocks in Las Vegas playing casinos there is one slot device in Las Vegas for each 8 inhabitants The Mona Lisa has no eyebrows. It replaced into the form in Renaissance Florence to shave them off daily 20 banks are robbed. the conventional take is $2,500 Tablecloths have been initially meant to be served as towels with which dinner travellers ought to wipe their arms and faces after ingesting Tipping in Iceland is seen an insult One vehicle out of each 230 made replaced into stolen final 12 months wooded area fires pass speedier uphill than downhill maximum lipstick incorporates fish scales!! ewww it somewhat is unlawful to drink beer out of a bucket in case you're sitting on a shrink in St. Louis Taphephobia is the terror of being buried alive! Clinophobia is the terror of beds! Porcupines flow in water! the only 15 letter be conscious which may be spelled with out repeating a letter is "uncopyrightable" The longest recorded flight of a fowl is 13 seconds Cat urine glows under a black-easy the international's termites outweigh the international's people 10 to a million the electrical powered chair replaced into invented via a dentist i stumbled on those somewhat interesting!!
2016-10-19 00:59:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Problem #1 Your mention only one study.
Problem #2 It only involved 400 people, considering the population of vegetarians it makes sense there may not be one in this group they picked.
Problem #3 (and this is just how I feel) I would rather live to be 80 or 90 and healthy and active, then be 100 in a wheelchair on oxygen after my second heart attack, or stoke.
Problem #4 there is plenty of evidence to suggest otherwise.
Read: Healthy at 100 by: John Robbins.
2006-12-27 03:07:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Here's a few articles about vegetarians living longer. 400 is a pretty small sample for a scientific survey. Even opinion polls take a larger sample. Looks like a bit of lazy thinking by a newspaper.
2006-12-27 06:32:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by totnesmartin 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes meat in moderation is better than too much meat or no meat at all and if you eat a well balanced diet including meat you can live longer than a vegetarian or vegan.
2006-12-27 10:56:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Half-pint 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Humans are omnivores. Yeah, we can survive as carnivores or herbivores, and have good quality of life, but there's no denying what comes naturally.
2006-12-27 03:24:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jes 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Whatever lets you sleep at night....
2006-12-27 17:12:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by saligiare 1
·
1⤊
0⤋