I think anyone who believes that they would be able to let themselves go through the agony and slow painful demise that is starving to death if there was a food source available is deluding themselves.
The original people there probably thought cannibalism was terrible before the event, as vegans believes eating meat is terrible now, but when push comes to shove I think very few people would put their morals over the slimmest chance of survival in that situation.
2006-12-23 04:43:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by AndyB 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that I for one would let myself starve to death and feed the others in my party. I have just not been able to see the reasoning in eating others/ animals when you will just likely die in that situation anyway. Why make others die too when you can help them live? Though I am a coward, so maybe I would be doing the whole cannibalism thing.
But it would depend on the vegan, right? Some of us are vegan just because of the conditions in which the animals live and die, so if we gave them a humane death, maybe they wouldn't stay vegans?
2006-12-23 03:47:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by treehuggingveganhippy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
i've got been vegetarian considering that i grew to become into in 10th grade, 4 years in the past.( For a million 12 months of that, i grew to become into vegan). It does look like this is a scene ingredient to do yet then you certainly basically ought to think of... the animals are being saved regardless of the reason human beings are not eating them, it quite is a good ingredient. this is stupid what human beings will do to be "scene" yet oh nicely. a minimum of they are doing issues that are constructive.
2016-11-23 12:57:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Until dinner was served! Yum!
2006-12-23 01:01:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
When survival is at stake, all bets are off.
2006-12-23 01:41:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wolfeblayde 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Until the day she starved to death
2006-12-23 00:59:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Z 5
·
0⤊
1⤋