This is very sad, that a newspaper like the New York Times is anti-American workers. We the American people have to know that the management of the New York Times is pro-illegal aliens and they would do anything to support them,, that is a shame..
2006-12-21 01:03:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Liberals are agents of the right wing; that's why they are called Limousine Liberals. These bossy snobs belong in the Nazi-Con Republican Party. They took over the Democratic Party long ago. All the years the Dems controlled Congress, the unions lost power year after year. The children of the working class must be paid a salary to go to college, just like the Preppies are given a healthy allowance to go there. The NYTwits direct their snooty pseudo-Liberalism to college graduates, who are either upper-class or boytoy class traitors from Middle America.
2006-12-21 11:42:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
? Did you just wake up? The paper seems to me to be close to what it has been for 50 years. That it is anti-working class seems a stretch.
2006-12-21 07:39:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by madjer21755 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's the newspaper of record. I don't usually read it to recreate, but for historical purposes, it makes an excellent primary source.
2006-12-21 08:06:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mark P 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Its norml in the UK to have Left wing and right wing newspapers, whats wrong with it?
If you don't agree with their ideals, read a more liberal newspaper, simple.
2006-12-21 07:31:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by TellMeWhy? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The newspaper is expansive
2006-12-21 10:51:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by JAMES 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I could figure that out years ago,did you have to wait until you were told?Our public is indeed challenged.You give me your cash?
2006-12-21 07:45:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I refuse to read it or support those anti humans.
2006-12-21 21:32:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Legandivori 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This isn't true, and when they expose government and business corruption, they act in the interest of all the people.
2006-12-21 07:38:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Red Herring 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's just another fish-wrapper.
2006-12-21 09:53:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋