Thanks!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329&q=Larry+silverstein
2006-12-20 19:52:46 · 7 answers · asked by Freezin 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
WTC #7 suffered some structural damage from debris falling from the North and South towers. #7 was further weakened by fires ignited during the planes' impact and broken gas mains on the ground. Late on 9-11, NYC Firefighters made the determination that it was too dangerous to continue fighting the fires and moved away to a safe distance. The weight of #7 of the heat-weakened structural columns caused it to collapse. I took longer to fall as it was not as top-heavy as the North and South towers.
2006-12-20 19:57:11 · answer #1 · answered by hartless63 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
While it wasn't struck by an airliner, Building 7 was damaged by fire and by debris from the falling towers.
It was abandoned by firefighters when it became apparent the building was unsafe. The collapse was probably the result of fires, primarily. Had the building not fallen it would probably have had to have been demolished.
2006-12-20 19:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by Warren D 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Don@ld Bumsfeld , Dickhe@d Chen*y & G*orge Bush
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3dwtf-qd3o&feature=PlayList&p=8080BABFAE3DB14B&index=32
HEIL BUSH !!!
2006-12-20 20:56:16 · answer #3 · answered by George W Bush 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The same as the other two WTCs - demolitions.
2006-12-21 16:18:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
watch the "loose change" video on google. there's a lot more scientific evidence in it than some man sitting in a room talking.
2006-12-20 20:49:05 · answer #5 · answered by jamoncita 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
gravity combined with a whole lot of explosives
2006-12-20 21:15:38 · answer #6 · answered by Ringo G. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why did it fall straight down...was that normal??shouldnt it have tipped or half collapsed??
2006-12-20 20:10:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋