2006-12-20 15:52:24 · 4 answers · asked by bitterswtchocolate 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Nevermind answerers who apparently don't know what the term "end strength" means. Oh, and there's not going to be a draft.
But yes, to say that an increase in troop numbers (not just in Iraq, I'm assuming you're saying if he increases the total number of marines and army as his interview a few days ago would seem to imply) anyway... where was I? Oh yes, to increase the total number of troops is just a different way of saying the same thing as increasing the end strength.
End strength is the total number of troops any one particular branch is allowed to have at any given time. Increase troop authorizations, and the end strength goes up by default
2006-12-21 04:20:28 · answer #1 · answered by promethius9594 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
on the element President Bush adopts a sparkling coverage that reflects a logical course he would locate he has extra suitable help. even though it style of feels that this President in basic terms listens to his very own drummer trouble-free experience be damned. What bothers me the main approximately this u . s . a . and how they view that's that congress can impeach a President for having an affair yet no longer even evaluate it for a President this is to blame for hundreds of hundreds of deaths for no objective. He attacked yet another u . s . a . that became no longer attacking us and provided no possibility to us quickly. This u . s . a . isn't in basic terms no longer safer with this President we are at extra suitable possibility than ever and our stature interior the international has been a great deal lessened. And what did it take to get this President to do some thing......the individuals of this u . s . a . took away the republican administration ed congress. Has he heard the message? With no longer something for him to lose interior the subsequent election he has no longer. And all of this from a self professed compassionate conservative. If that's compassion i think of we would desire to return to the previous conservative procedures of company first...then the individuals.
2016-12-11 13:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the troops getting sent over there will be SF types, (special Forces) Their job is to train armies and militias or any giving uprising that is the U.S. best interest to fight so we don't have to send our guys in the meat grinder. The U.S. public would rather see a 3rd world booger eater getting killed then Jon Boy from North Dakota getting smoked.
2006-12-20 16:07:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If Pres. Bush sends more troops to Iraq he would have to bring back the draft. That is just common sense.
2006-12-20 16:08:44 · answer #4 · answered by Tenn Gal 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋