English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

funny how the plane that hit the empire state building years ago didnt vaporize, nor did the building collapse. ONE OTHER NOTE OF INTEREST...it's fascinating how the investigation revealing voter fraud in the 2000 election came out the day after 911 (just like the investigation by the house committee on assassinations regarding the kennedy assassination PROVED there to be a conspiracy with the JFK murder came out the week of the "guyana tragedy"...) -- the phrase "mass hoodwinking" comes to mind when i think of americans perception of their own govt.

one can only assume that americans clearly have their head up their sphincter....

2006-12-20 06:53:55 · 11 answers · asked by dude s 2 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

Well, let's see.

a) The B-25 that hit the Empire State Building did not carry anywhere near as much fuel as the jets that hit the WTC towers, and it all stayed on the outer layers of the building, rather than penetrating inside. In addition, it was not moving nearly so fast when it hit, and the Empire State Building was built with a different support structure than the WTC towers.

b) The WTC did not "vaporize" -- the heat of the burning fuel softened the support system and caused the supports to collapse. Once they warped and collapsed, the mass and momentum of the portions of the towers above the fire caused the building to pancake to the ground. The rest of the damage was pure physics.

c) Did you miss all the eyewitness accounts, the video footage, the recovery of corpses and debris? Have you even watched the film footage of the event? Do you have any clue at all about what you are ranting about? I was there -- where were you?

Oh, that's right, you said it yourself -- you were (and still are) suffering from a severe case of cranio-rectitis.

2006-12-20 14:52:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 3 0

Funny how the plane that hit the Empire State Building years ago was a heck of a lot smaller than a Boeing 757 and was carrying a heck of a lot less highly flammable jet fuel (oh, did I mention that it was also traveling quite a bit slower than the planes that brought down the Twin Towers?). Funny how Osama bin Laden took responsibility for the attack, and funny how all the terrorists involved were identified with the help of INTERPOL, a criminal police organization that is in no way under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Government.

One can only assume that you are (a) about as intelligent as a bovine and as easy to lead, or (b) a delusional paranoiac.

2006-12-20 07:05:45 · answer #2 · answered by sarge927 7 · 3 0

You forgot to mention how the phantom planes were being piloted by Cylons and Borg

2006-12-20 07:25:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 3 0

Great just what the world needs, another conspiracy theory .

Yes , that was sarcasm .

2006-12-20 07:07:37 · answer #4 · answered by Ray H 7 · 2 0

Utterly fascinating.


http://zapatopi.net/afdb/build.html

2006-12-20 07:03:59 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. Quest 5 · 0 2

Get check out for paranoid schizophrenia--Before you become a danger to yourself or others.

2006-12-20 07:03:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

WOW, I don't remember that...Where was the 3rd skyscraper that was vaporized?????

2006-12-20 07:02:35 · answer #7 · answered by chazzer 5 · 3 0

Here you go

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

2006-12-23 07:50:52 · answer #8 · answered by Sir J 7 · 0 0

psssst, terrorist exist! pass it on.

Oh yeah tell Bigfoot hi for me.

Idiot!

2006-12-20 06:58:23 · answer #9 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 3 0

check this out www.prison planet.com www.infowars.com and www.rense.com yea i totally agree with you. so many lies are being told to the public.

2006-12-20 07:03:38 · answer #10 · answered by imalickyouallover69 5 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers