Even though any research into protection against the common cold must involve animal testing.
2006-12-20 06:21:40 · 6 answers · asked by Perseus 3 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Infectious Diseases
I love animals - dogs, cats, bunnies, you name it, I probably like it. But I would rather a bunny gave up his life for mankind so better drugs can be produced than letting millions of humans die. Preservation of the species, and the species I want to preserve most is us, is what it is all about.
I feel sorry for the animals who are sacrificed. I thank them for their sacrifice.
2006-12-20 11:35:58 · answer #1 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am now and always will be against testing on live subjects _which cannot speak_.
It is wrong to do inflict any harm (which live testing is) on those who are unable to communicate their consent or denial thereof.
Testing on humans, fine. Humans are able to make the choice for themselves.
2006-12-20 14:27:33 · answer #2 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
PETA believes in animal testing. Just ask their second in command at Nazi I mean PETA headquarters.
Fact not Fiction. Also PETA Kills many, many animals
Approx Statistic
Rescued 2,100 Dogs
Killed 1,400 of those dogs
"Saved" by PETA 700- yikes!
They also have a cadaver fridge that is larger than my Butchers!
Test away!
2006-12-20 14:32:31 · answer #3 · answered by Harry Merkin 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
if they want to cure a human they should test on a human. It is not right to test on animals. they can't speak for themselves. humans need to get over themselves and realize they are not the only ones alive. I hate humans
2006-12-20 14:24:23 · answer #4 · answered by talarlo 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
scared of a little cold?
2006-12-20 14:24:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I still say use mass murderers or paedophiles!
2006-12-20 14:23:28 · answer #6 · answered by puffy 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋