My understanding is that HIV virus is too big to penetrate the skin in many parts of human body except mucus and some other membranes get into blood. I also read that HIV can penetrate easily through tears or lacerations in the skin or covering of an organ.
If so, can one prepare the following beverage and administer it to a human being as an act of revenge or other evil intent? If the answer is yes, how can the forensics prove that evil act t o enforce the law?
The beverage consists of an ingradient that will cause ulcers in the stomach, such as strong coffee mixed with alcohol. It may also contain something that tears up the walls of the intestines such as a fine ground silica or glass. Both of the above will create an opening for the HIV virus to penetrate. Then of course it will contain HIV virus or infected blood or serum. It may also contain HSV-2 virus to facilitate HIV virus damage the immune system more readily.
2006-12-12 15:53:27 · 2 answers · asked by stvenryn 4 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ STDs
I understand this is a very serious matter. I am not trying to prepare such a beverage or kill any one. I consider human life is extremely precious for it gives an opportunity for the human to experience and evolve into higher levels of existence and spirirituality. But I feel that unassuming people out there in the world should be aware of the fact that such possibility exists and that medical and legal communities should be prepared to deal with it.
2006-12-12 15:59:26 · update #1
From my understanding, the actual HIV cells are quite different from person to person whom did not obtain it from the same place, there are different components to each one, quite like DNA and it can be matched to the person it came from. So if the police had someone they thought to be this person whom made the beverage, if that person was the originator of the HIV, they would be able to see it by studying the particular viruses in both persons. However, if it did not originate to the person making the beverage, there would be less hard evidence and more circumstantial evidence, and thus a more difficult conviction.
2006-12-12 16:01:00 · answer #1 · answered by Ashley B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
[. ASHLEY_B]. IN MY OPION IS.100. PERCENT RIGHT ON THIS MATTER IN MY OPION AND I TOTALEY AGREE WITH HER ANSWER AS WELL TO, ?
2006-12-12 18:58:45 · answer #2 · answered by the_silverfoxx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋